Our new democratic state rep, Rebecca Brown, held a town meeting last night at Wendles, a local sandwich joint. Attending were about 20 democrats and yours truly. Discussion ranged around the state. Legalizing gambling drew a lot of attention. The attraction is money. Maggie the Hassan promised gambling would bring in $80 million. Even the democratic controlled state house of representatives didn't believe this and the wacked Maggie's $80 million out of the budget revenue estimates.
Sue Forth, another state rep from I-don't-know-where mentioned that the teacher's union opposed the budget deal because it didn't have gambling revenue in it. Sue said she didn't understand why the teachers felt that way. A number of people in the audience piped up and said the teachers want gambling revenue to pay for their retirements.
A lot of democrats present feel that NH needs more revenue. That sounds better than "tax hike". They pretty much understand about "the pledge" (No broad based taxes). So they like gambling. Someone proposed putting a $1 a bottle tax on wine. He claimed that would be enough balance the budget.
Rebecca floated the idea of tying Northern Pass to gambling, something like this. "If you, the governor, will insist on Northern Pass burying the wires, we North country reps will support your gambling bill." Response to this idea was no better than mixed. Everybody present thinks burying a million volt transmission line is doable.
In real life it is so costly that they will find a right of way thru Vermont before they bury the wires in NH. Nobody wanted to talk about all the property taxes the Northern Pass transmission line would pay to towns. We oughta know up here. Moore Dam taxes pay for a lot of stuff in Littleton.
This blog posts about aviation, automobiles, electronics, programming, politics and such other subjects as catch my interest. The blog is based in northern New Hampshire, USA
Monday, April 8, 2013
Sunday, April 7, 2013
The forty knot sailboat arrives
Nifty pictures here. It's totally cool, a big racing hydrofoil up planing on foils. I think they are going to sail for the America's Cup in this crazy contraption.
This is an idea that has been around for fifty years that I know of. I read a book "The Forty Knot Sailboat" back in 1967. The idea is to cut the water drag by getting the hull up out of the water and up on plane. Doing it with hydrofoils gives a smoother ride than banging the entire hull from wavetop to wavetop. Ordinary planeing hulls will beat them selves to pieces if they are planed in all but the calmest of waters, so the smooth ride bit is important.
The 1967 book claimed that a hydrofoil sailing yacht would be faster than motor yachts, fast enough to outrun a storm. The author said that conventional sailing yachts could do little to avoid a storm, they just had to heave to, batten down the hatches and spend a day or so getting bounced around by waves and drenched by rain. Whereas a hydrofoil could sail fast enough to get out of the path of the storm and avoid getting shellacked by nasty weather.
Off shore cruising, say a run across the Atlantic, is still a sailing yacht activity. Motor yachts cannot carry enough fuel to venture offshore, unless they are as big as a small steamship.
This is an idea that has been around for fifty years that I know of. I read a book "The Forty Knot Sailboat" back in 1967. The idea is to cut the water drag by getting the hull up out of the water and up on plane. Doing it with hydrofoils gives a smoother ride than banging the entire hull from wavetop to wavetop. Ordinary planeing hulls will beat them selves to pieces if they are planed in all but the calmest of waters, so the smooth ride bit is important.
The 1967 book claimed that a hydrofoil sailing yacht would be faster than motor yachts, fast enough to outrun a storm. The author said that conventional sailing yachts could do little to avoid a storm, they just had to heave to, batten down the hatches and spend a day or so getting bounced around by waves and drenched by rain. Whereas a hydrofoil could sail fast enough to get out of the path of the storm and avoid getting shellacked by nasty weather.
Off shore cruising, say a run across the Atlantic, is still a sailing yacht activity. Motor yachts cannot carry enough fuel to venture offshore, unless they are as big as a small steamship.
Saturday, April 6, 2013
Private sector creates wealth, Public sector consumes it
You hear democrats pushing for more public sector jobs "to improve the economy". They bewail the sequester and belt tightening at the state and local level that has laid off cops, teachers, and firemen, and they claim that hiring more public sector employees will reduce unemployment and make the economy grow again.
Trouble is, public sector jobs are a drag on the economy, they take money away from workers and businesses. This money does not produce any wealth. Take too much and the businesses have to raise prices, and the workers demand more money, which again raises prices.
Back in Keynes day, it didn't matter. Today, when prices go up, people buy from overseas sources (China) 'cause its cheaper. Go to WalMarts, everything on the shelves is made in China. Back in Keynes' time there were no overseas sources.
Today, countries that burden their businesses and workers with too many taxes find industry leaves their country for lower tax (also lower wage) overseas.
Can you say "Shoot yourself in the foot"?
Trouble is, public sector jobs are a drag on the economy, they take money away from workers and businesses. This money does not produce any wealth. Take too much and the businesses have to raise prices, and the workers demand more money, which again raises prices.
Back in Keynes day, it didn't matter. Today, when prices go up, people buy from overseas sources (China) 'cause its cheaper. Go to WalMarts, everything on the shelves is made in China. Back in Keynes' time there were no overseas sources.
Today, countries that burden their businesses and workers with too many taxes find industry leaves their country for lower tax (also lower wage) overseas.
Can you say "Shoot yourself in the foot"?
Friday, April 5, 2013
Provocative? who is provocative?
The White House announced that it will stop making nasty noises at the North Koreans for fear that we might provoke them. Oh really?
All official and unofficial (the MSM mostly) statements that I have heard on TV are super bland. Never a threat, always expressions of regret. We flew a few fancy warplanes into South Korea, but they turned around and flew back to bases in the US and Japan. That's not provovative, that's the bare minimum of support given to a loyal ally, an important trading partner, and a good friend facing extreme pressure. The North Koreans have denounced the 1950's armistice agreement, which is equivalent to starting up the Korean War again. The South Koreans are understandable worried (probably scared too) and they deserve a tiny bit of US support. Which is all they got. Tiny, emphasize tiny.
The North Korean's are vigorously stirring all sorts of pots, for reasons that make no sense to us. When they get over their mad, things will settle down. What we say and do doesn't matter at all. It's all up to the North Koreans.
All official and unofficial (the MSM mostly) statements that I have heard on TV are super bland. Never a threat, always expressions of regret. We flew a few fancy warplanes into South Korea, but they turned around and flew back to bases in the US and Japan. That's not provovative, that's the bare minimum of support given to a loyal ally, an important trading partner, and a good friend facing extreme pressure. The North Koreans have denounced the 1950's armistice agreement, which is equivalent to starting up the Korean War again. The South Koreans are understandable worried (probably scared too) and they deserve a tiny bit of US support. Which is all they got. Tiny, emphasize tiny.
The North Korean's are vigorously stirring all sorts of pots, for reasons that make no sense to us. When they get over their mad, things will settle down. What we say and do doesn't matter at all. It's all up to the North Koreans.
Thursday, April 4, 2013
Can landowners shoot down snoopy drones?
It's a lovely day, warm and dry and sunny. Friends and family are over and the barbie is hot in the back yard. Suddenly a buzzy helicopter drone with a TV camera swoops over your backyard.
Question: Can you take your shotgun and blow the pesky drone out of the air?
Question: Can you take your shotgun and blow the pesky drone out of the air?
How crazy are the North Koreans? Really?
Fox TV doesn't know. They are beginning to think the NORKS are really going to kick off the second Korean War. Which would be really crazy. If they do it, they will force the Japanese and the South Koreans to go nuclear just to contain the NORKS If the North Koreans actually nuke anybody, they will get nuked back. They can do a lot of damage to South Korea, they have artillery pieces that won't quit lined up on the border, and Seoul, the South Korean capital, a major city in a class with New York and Chicago, is easily with in range of North Korean guns. They could pound Seoul flat, inflicting a million casualties in a matter of hours.
Let's hope they aren't that crazy.
Let's hope they aren't that crazy.
TV commercials grow funnier
The latest amusing TV commercial has the AFLAC duck undergoing physical therapy, swimming, arm and biceps machines, stair climbing and all the rest. It's as funny as the GIECO gecko flubbing his lines filming a new commercial.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)