This blog posts about aviation, automobiles, electronics, programming, politics and such other subjects as catch my interest. The blog is based in northern New Hampshire, USA
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Stainless Steel is so dated.
There have been repeated rants in the home decorating, Martha Stewart, kind of press declaring stainless steel kitchen appliances to be dead, as dead as avacado green. This morning I saw a TV ad, showing a young couple, shopping for an icebox. They are in a store aisle, completely surrounded by stainless steel iceboxes. Like 20 of 'em. Reports of the death of stainless have been exaggerated.
The Supremes rule in favor of Gays today.
The Supremes overturned California Prop 8 which forbids gay marriage in the state of California. They did it on a technicality rather that come right out and say "The US Constitution Article such-an-such means gay marriage is legal". Probably they couldn't agree among then selves on such an interpretation. Instead they decided that the plaintiffs lacked "standing", a lawyer's way of throwing out lawsuits. And doing it this way, the ruling only affects California, it doesn't impose gay marriage on the non-gay marriage states, which would cause political outrage.
It also supports judge made law. It was a lower court that overturned Prop 8. That ruling is what got appealed all the way to the Supremes. The Supremes have said, "Doesn't matter what the voters say, we judges can make our own laws to suit ourselves." Real democracy that is.
On the real issue, I'm neutral, we have gay marriage here in New Hampshire, the legislature voted it in. There has been some grumbling, but the bulk of the citizens are going along with a state law passed by majority vote in the state legislature. The sky has not fallen.
While they were at it, in a separate case, the Supremes overturned most of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) Here at least, they ruled that DOMA violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution. They didn't mention that DOMA was as hard on lesbians as it was on gays. Far as I am concerned, that's equal protection, or at least equal prosecution.
But heh, they are the Supremes and we are stuck with 'em.
It also supports judge made law. It was a lower court that overturned Prop 8. That ruling is what got appealed all the way to the Supremes. The Supremes have said, "Doesn't matter what the voters say, we judges can make our own laws to suit ourselves." Real democracy that is.
On the real issue, I'm neutral, we have gay marriage here in New Hampshire, the legislature voted it in. There has been some grumbling, but the bulk of the citizens are going along with a state law passed by majority vote in the state legislature. The sky has not fallen.
While they were at it, in a separate case, the Supremes overturned most of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) Here at least, they ruled that DOMA violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution. They didn't mention that DOMA was as hard on lesbians as it was on gays. Far as I am concerned, that's equal protection, or at least equal prosecution.
But heh, they are the Supremes and we are stuck with 'em.
Monday, June 24, 2013
So What is a "Registered Provisional Immigrant"?
I first saw this phrase in an Email from my US Senator supporting the 1200 page Corker-What's-his-face amendment.
Sounds like all those 11 million or so illegals currently in the country become "registered provisional immigrants" (RPI for short) as soon as the bill is passed. Or as soon as they file a form down at the Post Office. Wanna bet all those instant RPI's gain the right to stay in the US and the right to work in the US? Once they have that, who needs a green card? I mean a lot of perfectly decent folk just want to hold a job, raise their families, and pursue a little happiness. Gaining US citizenship is of less importance to them, just as long as they can stay in the country and maintain a low profile.
So, after declaring everyone an RPI, why do we need E-verify or employer sanctions? I mean now that everybody is legal, sort of, why do we need by bang on employers about who they hire? Especially since we are still in the grip of Great Depression 2.0 and want to get unemployment down?
Sounds like all those 11 million or so illegals currently in the country become "registered provisional immigrants" (RPI for short) as soon as the bill is passed. Or as soon as they file a form down at the Post Office. Wanna bet all those instant RPI's gain the right to stay in the US and the right to work in the US? Once they have that, who needs a green card? I mean a lot of perfectly decent folk just want to hold a job, raise their families, and pursue a little happiness. Gaining US citizenship is of less importance to them, just as long as they can stay in the country and maintain a low profile.
So, after declaring everyone an RPI, why do we need E-verify or employer sanctions? I mean now that everybody is legal, sort of, why do we need by bang on employers about who they hire? Especially since we are still in the grip of Great Depression 2.0 and want to get unemployment down?
Saturday, June 22, 2013
He must be guilty of something
Snowdon was indicted on NPR this morning for swiping government property and espionage. Well they gotta charge him with something in order to ask the Chinese to extradite him. Surely revealing top secret stuff to the newspapers is against the law. At least back when I had a top secret clearance we all believed that revealing classified stuff was illegal. I don't know what lawyers would call such a crime, but there ought to be a name for it.
I don't quite go along with Dick Cheney and calling Snowdon a traitor. "Treason against the United States shall consist only of levying War against them or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them aid and comfort." Article III, section 3. The founders put this in the Constitution to forbid the British crown's practice of declaring anything that angered the King to be treason.
Snowdon's actions so far, although disloyal, don't quite rise to levying war, and the Chinese aren't exactly enemies of the United States. Competitors, critics, pains in the tail, no good nicks, but not enemies.
The radio went on to describe the Snowdon situation as "a beginning epic legal battle". Well, before that matters much, we have to get Snowdon into US custody. Somehow I don't think the Chinese are going to cooperate in that. And there isn't all that much we can do to pressure them.
I don't quite go along with Dick Cheney and calling Snowdon a traitor. "Treason against the United States shall consist only of levying War against them or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them aid and comfort." Article III, section 3. The founders put this in the Constitution to forbid the British crown's practice of declaring anything that angered the King to be treason.
Snowdon's actions so far, although disloyal, don't quite rise to levying war, and the Chinese aren't exactly enemies of the United States. Competitors, critics, pains in the tail, no good nicks, but not enemies.
The radio went on to describe the Snowdon situation as "a beginning epic legal battle". Well, before that matters much, we have to get Snowdon into US custody. Somehow I don't think the Chinese are going to cooperate in that. And there isn't all that much we can do to pressure them.
Friday, June 21, 2013
Farm Bill killed in House
The House voted down the 2013 US Farm bill by 234 to 195. Hurrah. The Farm Bill is the purest kind of pork. It takes my tax money and hands it out to farmers, most of whom are big corporations. The suits bought out the family farmers long ago. What money doesn't go to corporations goes to funding Food Stamps. Preliminary news reports are sketchy, but it sounds like this was a $ 1 trillion dollars over ten years bill.
Don't celebrate just yet. There is a good chance the combination of farm state votes and urban food stamps votes will pass a continuing resolution to keep the current farm program spending alive.
Don't celebrate just yet. There is a good chance the combination of farm state votes and urban food stamps votes will pass a continuing resolution to keep the current farm program spending alive.
Thursday, June 20, 2013
The Guns at Last Light
Rick Atkinson. This third history book carries the story from D-Day to defeat of Germany. It's thick, it's well written and reads nicely. It is the story of the US Army in WWII. Allies, air forces, navies, Soviets, war production, Ultra, etc you have to go somewhere else. It covers all the side shows in the European theater that most histories ignore. Here is the story of the second landing in France, the Colmar pocket, Market Garden, and the Huertzgen Forest. Now that all the participants are safely dead, it is possible to explore the political wrangling that was kept quiet for so long. As Atkinson tells it, Montgomery spent the war being insufferable, and Eisenhower spent the war suffering him in the interests of keeping the Allies allied. Also impressive is the sheer size of the war effort. The number of men sent into combat and the mountains of materiel (stuff) produced and shipped overseas to sustain the massive forces in the field is incredible even by the standards of 70 years later. It's a good read, right up there with Samuel Elliot Morison.
An Army and Dawn and Day of Battle, Atkinson's first two books are also good.
An Army and Dawn and Day of Battle, Atkinson's first two books are also good.
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Suits never learn
Aviation Week interviewed Boeing CEO Jim McNerney.
Aviation Week: "In retrospect, was the amount of weight you saved with Lithium Ion batteries a case of too much risk for too little reward?"
McNerney: "It's not as simple as a weight-reduction-gone-awry conclusion because we get added capability from this battery, such as its capacity to quickly charge. In an all electric airplane, its a more capable battery.
Yeah right. Added capability is bafflegab. All a battery can do is supply electricity. As far "quick charging" and "all electric airplane", all the battery has to do is get the engines started. Then the aircraft runs off generator power. As long as the battery recharges before the engines shut down at the end of the flight, all is well.
In actual fact, some one at Boeing got carried away with the coolness of lithium batteries and did not bother to consider the fire hazard, which might not have been clear when the 787 was first conceived back in the late 1990's, but was pretty obvious by 2003 or 4. Everyone else in the industry dropped lithium battery plans after they started catching fire in the 787.
Aviation Week: "In retrospect, was the amount of weight you saved with Lithium Ion batteries a case of too much risk for too little reward?"
McNerney: "It's not as simple as a weight-reduction-gone-awry conclusion because we get added capability from this battery, such as its capacity to quickly charge. In an all electric airplane, its a more capable battery.
Yeah right. Added capability is bafflegab. All a battery can do is supply electricity. As far "quick charging" and "all electric airplane", all the battery has to do is get the engines started. Then the aircraft runs off generator power. As long as the battery recharges before the engines shut down at the end of the flight, all is well.
In actual fact, some one at Boeing got carried away with the coolness of lithium batteries and did not bother to consider the fire hazard, which might not have been clear when the 787 was first conceived back in the late 1990's, but was pretty obvious by 2003 or 4. Everyone else in the industry dropped lithium battery plans after they started catching fire in the 787.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)