The young voters are heavy internet users. They all believe that everything should be free. They want to download music, movies, ebooks, you name it, for free. There are some things we could do to make interneting more harmonious.
First, rewrite copy right law. Current copyright runs for the life of the author plus seventy years. We ought to cut that back to fourteen or seventeen years, like it used to be. That would take all the good pop music off copyright and allow downloading legally. My children's ipads are stocked with the great songs I remember fondly from my college years. That was more than seventeen years ago. The kids would love this. The labels hate the idea. Labels don't vote.
Then repeal the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which permits all sorts of legal bullying by Hollywood and the labels. The kids would love this. Hollywood and the labels hate it. They don't vote.
Then repeal the age 21 drinking law that MADD rod rodded thru Congress twenty years ago. Make drinking age a matter of state law. The kids would love this. And, it would increase safety. Colleges ought to operate on-campus pubs. Students would prefer sipping a few, at a place where their friends might be. After having a few, they can walk back to dorm. Much safer than driving back to campus after a party. Not sure just who is against this idea, but someone is.
Social security and medicare reform. Most young people figure these programs will be gone long before they get eligible for them. They would be fine with some modest trim backs of benefits. They see FICA taking a big whack out of their paychecks, and they don't see any payback for themselves. They see it as a tax on them to support the elderly.
This blog posts about aviation, automobiles, electronics, programming, politics and such other subjects as catch my interest. The blog is based in northern New Hampshire, USA
Saturday, April 26, 2014
Friday, April 25, 2014
Republicans need a platform to win this year
Despite all the pundits claiming this is a Republican year due to misteps by the Obama Adminstration, I am worried. In 2012 Obama carried the women's vote by 10%. That was enough to win the election coast to coast. Women are half the voters. Republicans do poorly with young voters, and that can be fatal. As the seniors die off, the young voters take their places and if they are all democrats, we can kiss the GOP goodby.
Let's talk about women voters first. The Republicans need to get off the pro-life thing. For every pro-life voter we gain, we lose a young woman who fears getting pregnant and not being able to stop it. The party needs to stop backing all those little laws that chip away at abortion. The party doesn't need to switch over to a pro-choice stance, it just needs to stop talking about it. The ardent pro-life people will whine and cry, but in the end they will vote Republican. And a lot of younger women will too.
Health Care is a top issue with women, they are the caregivers who take the children to the pediatrician. Unlike men, women are more likely to go to the doctor when something hurts. Men are more apt to just tough it out, not wanting to loose pay or appear soft. So healthcare counts, big time with women. Obamacare is disliked by the majority of voters. But the Republicans have not offered an Obamacare replacement, probably because they cannot agree on what it ought to be. And Republican leadership has failed to get the party together on a plan, probably fearing that whatever they propose the media will savage them on it.
We ought to propose freedom for insurance companies. Any insurance company licensed to do business by any state in the union, is free to sell insurance in all fifty states. Right now, to sell insurance you have to get a license from the state you are selling in. To jump thru fifty sets of paperwork hoops to get licensed in fifty different states is beyond any company. So a lot of states, like New Hampshire, only have ONE insurance company doing business in the state. And, monopoly leads to price gouging. Voters would love the idea. Insurance companies hate it. Insurance companies don't vote.
We ought to propose freedom to import drugs. Any drug approved by the health authorities of decent first world countries (Canada, England, France, Germany, and some others) may be imported duty free and sold by drug stores. This would drop the price of prescription drugs a lot. Voters would love the idea. Drug companies hate the idea. Drug companies don't vote.
We need to clamp down on malpractice suits. Right now every doctor has to pay $100,000 a year for malpractice insurance, unless he wants to be sued into poverty. This is largely a matter of state law. Up here in New Hampshire we did something about malpractice which cut the rate in half. Other states could do likewise. Voters are OK with this idea. Lawyers hate it. Although lawyers can vote, there aren't all that many of them.
We need to scrap the regulations that force gold plating of medical facilities. For instance at Dartmouth Hitchkok the main building is topped by a gigantic row of air conditioners. Turns out, regulations require the hospital to hold temperature to 72 degrees plus or minus ONE degree. which is ridiculous, in addition to ridiculously expensive.
Let's talk about women voters first. The Republicans need to get off the pro-life thing. For every pro-life voter we gain, we lose a young woman who fears getting pregnant and not being able to stop it. The party needs to stop backing all those little laws that chip away at abortion. The party doesn't need to switch over to a pro-choice stance, it just needs to stop talking about it. The ardent pro-life people will whine and cry, but in the end they will vote Republican. And a lot of younger women will too.
Health Care is a top issue with women, they are the caregivers who take the children to the pediatrician. Unlike men, women are more likely to go to the doctor when something hurts. Men are more apt to just tough it out, not wanting to loose pay or appear soft. So healthcare counts, big time with women. Obamacare is disliked by the majority of voters. But the Republicans have not offered an Obamacare replacement, probably because they cannot agree on what it ought to be. And Republican leadership has failed to get the party together on a plan, probably fearing that whatever they propose the media will savage them on it.
We ought to propose freedom for insurance companies. Any insurance company licensed to do business by any state in the union, is free to sell insurance in all fifty states. Right now, to sell insurance you have to get a license from the state you are selling in. To jump thru fifty sets of paperwork hoops to get licensed in fifty different states is beyond any company. So a lot of states, like New Hampshire, only have ONE insurance company doing business in the state. And, monopoly leads to price gouging. Voters would love the idea. Insurance companies hate it. Insurance companies don't vote.
We ought to propose freedom to import drugs. Any drug approved by the health authorities of decent first world countries (Canada, England, France, Germany, and some others) may be imported duty free and sold by drug stores. This would drop the price of prescription drugs a lot. Voters would love the idea. Drug companies hate the idea. Drug companies don't vote.
We need to clamp down on malpractice suits. Right now every doctor has to pay $100,000 a year for malpractice insurance, unless he wants to be sued into poverty. This is largely a matter of state law. Up here in New Hampshire we did something about malpractice which cut the rate in half. Other states could do likewise. Voters are OK with this idea. Lawyers hate it. Although lawyers can vote, there aren't all that many of them.
We need to scrap the regulations that force gold plating of medical facilities. For instance at Dartmouth Hitchkok the main building is topped by a gigantic row of air conditioners. Turns out, regulations require the hospital to hold temperature to 72 degrees plus or minus ONE degree. which is ridiculous, in addition to ridiculously expensive.
Thursday, April 24, 2014
Pitch ball? Spit ball? This is news?
All over the TV news. A Yankee's pitcher had pine pitch on his neck. Strictly verbotten in baseball. Making the ball sticky is all kinds of against the rules. It's like pitching a spitball. News coverage is INTENSE. Must be a slow news day.
Long Island town has massive SWAT team
Been watching this on TV. A prank call brought out a 60-70 man SWAT team, all in black uniforms and black helmets, toting machine guns, equipped with armored Humvees. All this to a suburban home in Nassau county NY? Who/what did they expect to oppose them? Al Quada in New York? The Symbionese Liberation Army? The Suprano's? Sure looks like over kill to me. Lucky nobody got shot.
Could it be that once the town cops got funding for a SWAT team they wanted to use it for something?
For that matter, did the BLM send all those armed men to the Bundy ranch because they were on the payroll and had nothing better to do? Should federal bureaus (except the FBI) have armed agents at all? The proper procedure for a bureaucracy to apply force to citizens is to obtain a court order, and have local law enforcement carry it out. Not to dispatch their own private pug uglies to bust heads.
Could it be that once the town cops got funding for a SWAT team they wanted to use it for something?
For that matter, did the BLM send all those armed men to the Bundy ranch because they were on the payroll and had nothing better to do? Should federal bureaus (except the FBI) have armed agents at all? The proper procedure for a bureaucracy to apply force to citizens is to obtain a court order, and have local law enforcement carry it out. Not to dispatch their own private pug uglies to bust heads.
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Time to ante up. 600 US soldiers vs 40,000 Russians
It's on the TV news. Despite the superior combat skills of US forces, somehow I don't think 600 guys have a chance against 40,000.
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Do you believe in powdered alcohol?
Fox news has been running short pieces on this new product every hour or so during the day. This concept first appeared in a Harry Harrison science fiction story, one of the Stainless Steel Rat stories, many years ago. I'm not the world's greatest chemist, but I do know that alcohol is a liquid, and it will freeze, it will boil, but it won't turn into a powder. Could it be that gullible newsies, who never studied even high school chemistry, have fallen for an April Fools story?
Space-X lands a rocket booster, on land
The video is fascinating, a big rocket hovering on engine power and carefully backing down to the ground. Landing upright, all in one piece. Space-X hopes to lower the cost of spaceflight by soft landing and reusing the booster. Amusingly, the Fox News commentator keep referring to the rocket engines as "afterburners". Sorry Fox, an afterburner is a power boosting device applied to jet engines, not rockets. Afterburners can double your thrust, at the cost of horrible fuel consumption. Only military fighter planes are equipped with afterburners due to their ability to suck down fuel like a sewer pipe. To call the rocket engines of a booster afterburners reveals the depth of ignorance of the newsies.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)