They used to be a characteristic feature of police states. Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, North Korea, Red China, the Soviet Union, all issued ID cards, and woe betide the citizen who failed to produce his ID when stopped by the police. In America we have always taken pride in an open society, we don't have citizen's ID cards. When social security cards first came out they were marked "Not for Identification Purposes" just to emphasize that they were for social security benefits only.
Well that's faded out. Driver's licenses now have color photos. You better have yours on you should you get stopped on the road. You need to show ID to board an aircraft. You have to show ID to get a job. And now, we are moving toward demanding ID in order to vote. The democrats are pushing back against this, claiming that many citizens lack photo ID. This I doubt, everyone has a driver's license. The majority feels voter ID is a good idea to prevent voter fraud. Which it probably is.
But, I kinda like the old ways, when we didn't have to show our papers all the time. When we put in voter ID we are telling citizens, get ID if you want to vote. It's a step toward a police state.
Thursday, May 1, 2014
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
Down with Toll Roads
After 60 years of a no-toll-road federal policy, the Obama administration is backsliding. They have been making noises that would allow states to put up toll booths on the interstate highways. Obviously the attraction of squeezing more money out of the people overcame the very sensible principle of freeways rather than toll roads.
Travel means business, sales, and money. It's good public policy to encourage travel and shipping. Tourists bring money, and spend it, all along the way and at their destination. Trucks bring every sort of good, which gets sold, for money. The more goods shipped the more money everyone makes. It was federal policy that freeways paid for themselves thru the increased business and economic activity. Discouraging travel and shipping thru road tolls costs us more in lost business than it returns in tolls.
Despite crying and wailing from the road contractors, US roads are in good shape, much better shape than say Canada. I drove around the Gaspe peninsula in Quebec once. It was a major road, a two lane provincial highway along the St Lawrence River. Only it had washed away to the point that only one lane was left. You don't see that in the US. Except for some really beat up roads around New York City, American roads are better than anywhere in Europe. We do not have an "infrastructure crisis" except in the minds of state highway departments and road contractors. Which has been used as an excuse to call for more money for "infrastructure". Road tolls might provide this extra revenue. So says the highway lobby.
I say we ought to stick to the freeways rather than toll roads policy.
Travel means business, sales, and money. It's good public policy to encourage travel and shipping. Tourists bring money, and spend it, all along the way and at their destination. Trucks bring every sort of good, which gets sold, for money. The more goods shipped the more money everyone makes. It was federal policy that freeways paid for themselves thru the increased business and economic activity. Discouraging travel and shipping thru road tolls costs us more in lost business than it returns in tolls.
Despite crying and wailing from the road contractors, US roads are in good shape, much better shape than say Canada. I drove around the Gaspe peninsula in Quebec once. It was a major road, a two lane provincial highway along the St Lawrence River. Only it had washed away to the point that only one lane was left. You don't see that in the US. Except for some really beat up roads around New York City, American roads are better than anywhere in Europe. We do not have an "infrastructure crisis" except in the minds of state highway departments and road contractors. Which has been used as an excuse to call for more money for "infrastructure". Road tolls might provide this extra revenue. So says the highway lobby.
I say we ought to stick to the freeways rather than toll roads policy.
B17 fighter plane?
That's what Fox News called it this morning. They were covering a decoration ceremony for some WWII Army Air Corps survivors. On missions over Germany their B17's got shot up and had to crash land in Switzerland. The Swiss "interned" them in conditions as harsh as a German POW camp. But since it was Switzerland, not Germany, the airmen were denied prisoner of war medals when WWII was over. Relatives worked long and hard to reverse this, and this morning the few airmen still alive were presented with their medals.
Aside from the Fox voiceover calling the B17 a fighter, all went well. How anyone could mistake the most famous American warplane, hero of movies such as Twelve o'Clock High, The War Lover, and Memphis Belle, as a fighter plane, reveals much about the shallowness of TV newsies. And this was on Fox, the best of 'em. Saints preserve us from what the bottom feeders like MSNBC are polluting the airwaves with.
Aside from the Fox voiceover calling the B17 a fighter, all went well. How anyone could mistake the most famous American warplane, hero of movies such as Twelve o'Clock High, The War Lover, and Memphis Belle, as a fighter plane, reveals much about the shallowness of TV newsies. And this was on Fox, the best of 'em. Saints preserve us from what the bottom feeders like MSNBC are polluting the airwaves with.
Tuesday, April 29, 2014
Get the Feds out of the Mortgage Business
The housing industry, realtors, builders, mortgage lenders, appliance makers, and others, back in Great Depression 1.0 persuaded Congress to give them a handout. They claimed a shortage of mortgage money was crimping the industry's wings, and housing was needed to provide jobs and "home ownership". And so our tax money was channeled into mortgages thru Fannie Mae. Actually, Fannie Mae made good money for many years. It borrowed at the low Federal T-bill rate because everyone believed that the US government would back up Fannie's bonds, and it loaned at the commercial mortgage rate, leaving a comfy profit margin. Fannie Mae even sold stock to private investors, with dividends paid out of the juicy profits. Fannie Mae (and its younger brother Freddie Mac) offered cushy jobs for retired politicians, and nice profits to investors.
In the 1980's Fannie got into, or started up, the "secondary mortgage market". In this deal, they would buy existing mortgages from the "primary" lenders, mostly banks. For a while this made money, but the side effects gave us Great Depression 2.0. The primary lenders found that they could make money on anything, do the mortgage, sock the buyer with hefty paperwork fees to do the deal, then sell the mortgage to Fannie. If the mortgage went bad, borrower skipped town, property wasn't worth the money in the mortgage, the primary lender didn't care. He made his money the minute Fannie bought the mortgage off him. And so the quality of the mortgages went down hill. Suddenly investors stopped loaning money to Fannie, and shortly after Great Depression 2.0 stalked the land, Fannie got taken over by the US treasury. $188 billion of your tax money was poured into Fannie to meet it's obligations.
With this sorry history, we ought to get the Federal government out of the mortgage business. There is plenty of private money to finance home buying. Remember, a mortgage is a VERY desirable deal for the lender. His loan is secured by real property, something tangible and salable. If the borrower defaults the bank gets the house. And, the borrower is highly motivated to make his payments. No spouse wants to explain to his partner why they and their children are getting pitched out into the street.
If private investors will buy US T-bills that only pay 3%, they will be happy to make an equally safe mortgage loan at 4.5%. They will be plenty of mortgage money if we give the mortgage business back to private banks. And we ought to forbid the selling of mortgages. When you make a mortgage you will own it til it's paid off. This will discourage doing mortgages that are bound to fail.
In the 1980's Fannie got into, or started up, the "secondary mortgage market". In this deal, they would buy existing mortgages from the "primary" lenders, mostly banks. For a while this made money, but the side effects gave us Great Depression 2.0. The primary lenders found that they could make money on anything, do the mortgage, sock the buyer with hefty paperwork fees to do the deal, then sell the mortgage to Fannie. If the mortgage went bad, borrower skipped town, property wasn't worth the money in the mortgage, the primary lender didn't care. He made his money the minute Fannie bought the mortgage off him. And so the quality of the mortgages went down hill. Suddenly investors stopped loaning money to Fannie, and shortly after Great Depression 2.0 stalked the land, Fannie got taken over by the US treasury. $188 billion of your tax money was poured into Fannie to meet it's obligations.
With this sorry history, we ought to get the Federal government out of the mortgage business. There is plenty of private money to finance home buying. Remember, a mortgage is a VERY desirable deal for the lender. His loan is secured by real property, something tangible and salable. If the borrower defaults the bank gets the house. And, the borrower is highly motivated to make his payments. No spouse wants to explain to his partner why they and their children are getting pitched out into the street.
If private investors will buy US T-bills that only pay 3%, they will be happy to make an equally safe mortgage loan at 4.5%. They will be plenty of mortgage money if we give the mortgage business back to private banks. And we ought to forbid the selling of mortgages. When you make a mortgage you will own it til it's paid off. This will discourage doing mortgages that are bound to fail.
Monday, April 28, 2014
Just one more thing for Republicans
Stop the NSA snooping of cell phones, all phones for that matter.
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probably cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Article IV. The "oath or affirmation" was language acceptable to the Quakers, who refused to take oaths as a matter of religious principle. Quakers would "affirm" their testimony, but would not testify under oath.
NSA is violating every clause of Article IV. They have no Warrant. They have no probably cause. Snooping every cell phone in the country is not "particularly describing the place to be searched".
It's creepy to know that government can check every person I ever telephoned, and probably where I was when I placed the call. Your (or my) political enemies could troll thru this record looking for dirt. Just accepting a phone call from some scum bag could do your rep, and your chances of winning an election, a lot of harm. How often have you picked up your phone and found some slimey robocaller on the line?
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probably cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." Article IV. The "oath or affirmation" was language acceptable to the Quakers, who refused to take oaths as a matter of religious principle. Quakers would "affirm" their testimony, but would not testify under oath.
NSA is violating every clause of Article IV. They have no Warrant. They have no probably cause. Snooping every cell phone in the country is not "particularly describing the place to be searched".
It's creepy to know that government can check every person I ever telephoned, and probably where I was when I placed the call. Your (or my) political enemies could troll thru this record looking for dirt. Just accepting a phone call from some scum bag could do your rep, and your chances of winning an election, a lot of harm. How often have you picked up your phone and found some slimey robocaller on the line?
But they won't vote Republican
The Washington Examiner has a story about the Laborers International union, which naturally favors Keystone XL. The Examiner cites union outrage over the Obama administrations latest stall on the pipeline. But, despite outrage, the 557,000 member union never says to its membership "Vote a straight Republican ticket, that will get us Keystone XL and keep us off unemployment." Here is a clear cut case where Republicans can help the union but the union people cannot drop their lifelong loyalty to the democrats. These are clearly instinct voters, not thinking voters.
The Examiner goes on to explain the role of hedge fund billionaire Tom Steyer, who gave $50 million to Obama, and promised to raise another $50 million. Obama clearly values the $100 million more than he values 557,000 live and voting union members. I guess he figures they are all dumb enough to vote democratic no matter what.
The Examiner goes on to explain the role of hedge fund billionaire Tom Steyer, who gave $50 million to Obama, and promised to raise another $50 million. Obama clearly values the $100 million more than he values 557,000 live and voting union members. I guess he figures they are all dumb enough to vote democratic no matter what.
Sunday, April 27, 2014
The Big Enchilada, jobs, jobs, and more jobs.
And everyone likes this one. Turn the economy around, get hiring people, have jobs for everyone, enough jobs that workers can quit companies they don't like and be able to find another job. That will bring wages up.
But to win the election, the GOP has to spell out HOW it is going to achieve this nirvana. Voters want specifics. Such as:
1. Start the Keystone XL pipeline. It will get crude oil shipments off the rails and into a pipe. It brings oil in from one of our closest allies. It will lower the price of gasoline and furnace oil. It will allow US export of fuels to our friends around the world.
2. Repeal Sarbanes Oxley. This 1000 page law is welfare for lawyers, an intolerable burden on companies, and has driven merger and acquisition business out of New York. Getting rid of Sarbanes Oxley will make it easier to run a business, and business is what employs people.
3. Repeal Dodd Frank. Another 1000 page law, welfare for lawyers. Dodd Frank sets up ways for taxpayers to bail out firms "too big to fail". Replace Dodd Frank with some anti trust action, any company too big to fail is clearly a trust, and needs to be busted. Dodd Frank tells Wall St speculators that they can take any sort of risk, when things go bad Uncle will bail you out.
4. Reform corporate income tax. For instance, money earned overseas should not be subject to US income tax. Companies that make money overseas should be free to bring the money back to the US and spend it. Right now Uncle takes 35% of every dollar brought home from overseas. At this rate, it makes sense to leave the money in overseas banks earning a couple a percent rather than investing it back here at home. And, that 35% corporate tax rate is the highest in the industrial world. No wonder companies are sending jobs overseas, the taxes are lower.
5. Reform the US patent system. Right now no one can bring any new product to market without some patent troll suing for patent infringement as soon as the product makes a little money. Look are the $600 million award against Blackberry some years ago. Blackberry is filing for bankruptcy today. Patents are granted for ridiculous things, like whether it takes one click or two clicks to place something in an internet shopping basket. This constant threat of mickey mouse lawsuits makes getting a start up company off the ground harder. It's the start ups that employ people.
6. Remind every one that a $10 minimum wage doesn't put more money in worker's pockets, instead it throws them out of work.
7. Repeal the "Corporate Average Fuel Economy" (CAFE) requirements. Four dollar a gallon gasoline is all the incentive anyone needs to build fuel efficient vehicles. The current CAFE requirement of nearly 50 mpg makes new cars ridiculously expensive, leading to lower car sales and people refurbishing old cars to keep them running longer.
But to win the election, the GOP has to spell out HOW it is going to achieve this nirvana. Voters want specifics. Such as:
1. Start the Keystone XL pipeline. It will get crude oil shipments off the rails and into a pipe. It brings oil in from one of our closest allies. It will lower the price of gasoline and furnace oil. It will allow US export of fuels to our friends around the world.
2. Repeal Sarbanes Oxley. This 1000 page law is welfare for lawyers, an intolerable burden on companies, and has driven merger and acquisition business out of New York. Getting rid of Sarbanes Oxley will make it easier to run a business, and business is what employs people.
3. Repeal Dodd Frank. Another 1000 page law, welfare for lawyers. Dodd Frank sets up ways for taxpayers to bail out firms "too big to fail". Replace Dodd Frank with some anti trust action, any company too big to fail is clearly a trust, and needs to be busted. Dodd Frank tells Wall St speculators that they can take any sort of risk, when things go bad Uncle will bail you out.
4. Reform corporate income tax. For instance, money earned overseas should not be subject to US income tax. Companies that make money overseas should be free to bring the money back to the US and spend it. Right now Uncle takes 35% of every dollar brought home from overseas. At this rate, it makes sense to leave the money in overseas banks earning a couple a percent rather than investing it back here at home. And, that 35% corporate tax rate is the highest in the industrial world. No wonder companies are sending jobs overseas, the taxes are lower.
5. Reform the US patent system. Right now no one can bring any new product to market without some patent troll suing for patent infringement as soon as the product makes a little money. Look are the $600 million award against Blackberry some years ago. Blackberry is filing for bankruptcy today. Patents are granted for ridiculous things, like whether it takes one click or two clicks to place something in an internet shopping basket. This constant threat of mickey mouse lawsuits makes getting a start up company off the ground harder. It's the start ups that employ people.
6. Remind every one that a $10 minimum wage doesn't put more money in worker's pockets, instead it throws them out of work.
7. Repeal the "Corporate Average Fuel Economy" (CAFE) requirements. Four dollar a gallon gasoline is all the incentive anyone needs to build fuel efficient vehicles. The current CAFE requirement of nearly 50 mpg makes new cars ridiculously expensive, leading to lower car sales and people refurbishing old cars to keep them running longer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)