This blog posts about aviation, automobiles, electronics, programming, politics and such other subjects as catch my interest. The blog is based in northern New Hampshire, USA
Friday, November 7, 2014
Snow in Franconia Notch
It stopped falling. We got two inches on my deck. I'd expect the summit of Cannon got a bit more. Not enough to open Cannon, but it helps.
If you have the votes, do it.
TV is full of happy talk about "bipartisanship" and "cooperation", and other psychobabble. Let's be real, the Republicans now have the votes in Congress to pass anything reasonable. They ought to do it. Some of it Obama will sign. Some of it he will veto. Make sure the issue is framed clearly so that you can bash Obama for the veto after he does it. Might as well start off easy, with some medium duty issues that Obama might sign, just to get things warmed up. Then press on with some heavy duty stuff, immigration, tax reform, EPA reform, budget, deficit, and other stuff.
What John Boehner and Mitch McConnell (expected Congressional leaders next term) ought to be asking is "Do we have the votes to pass this bill?" And by how solid a margin? Passing a bill by a mere single vote looks flaky and can make you look dumb, when some other single vote turns against it unexpectedly. If you don't have the votes, change the bill to attract more votes, or drop it. Don't waste time on losers.
Don't waste time trying to be "bipartisan". If you have the votes, pass it. If you don't, drop it.
What John Boehner and Mitch McConnell (expected Congressional leaders next term) ought to be asking is "Do we have the votes to pass this bill?" And by how solid a margin? Passing a bill by a mere single vote looks flaky and can make you look dumb, when some other single vote turns against it unexpectedly. If you don't have the votes, change the bill to attract more votes, or drop it. Don't waste time on losers.
Don't waste time trying to be "bipartisan". If you have the votes, pass it. If you don't, drop it.
Snow in Franconia Notch
It is coming down as I write this. It's beginning to stick on the grass. The ground has not frozen yet (we haven't had but one or two nights with frost to do the freezing) so the snow is melting on the road. No where near enough for skiing yet, but it is a good sign.
Thursday, November 6, 2014
Names have been changed to protect the guilty
That Wallops Island rocket crash last week. The one they are blaming on Russian built engines. The company called itself "Orbital Sciences" and the failed rocket they called "Antares".
Funny, up until the disaster at Wallops Island, the company was known as "United Launch Association" or "ULA" and the vehicle was called "Atlas". ULA was formed some years ago when Boeing and Lockheed decided to stop competing for NASA business, and spun off their space divisions. The two spun off divisions promptly merged, creating ULA. Their vehicle,Atlas, despite the Russian engines, has a pretty good record launching commercial comm sats, and military payloads (recon sats probably).
Up until last week, Aviation Week worried about the Russian engines, and the possibility of the Russians cutting off the supply of engines in a tit for tat over Ukraine sanctions. And they said, several times, that the cost of developing a US built engine would be prohibitive. Well, last release to the popular (low information) press blamed the disaster on the Russian engines and announced that they would be replaced, with a yet to be named, US engine. Nothing like an explosion filmed in full color to expedite the decision making process.
Update: Nov 7 20014. Aviation Week came in this morning. Apparently I am wrong, there ARE two US rocket operations, both using Russian built engines. Aviation Week discusses both. ULA and Atlas use a big Russian engine still in production, Orbital Science and Antares are using an old Russian engine, going back to the 1960's. Sorry about the misinformation.
Funny, up until the disaster at Wallops Island, the company was known as "United Launch Association" or "ULA" and the vehicle was called "Atlas". ULA was formed some years ago when Boeing and Lockheed decided to stop competing for NASA business, and spun off their space divisions. The two spun off divisions promptly merged, creating ULA. Their vehicle,Atlas, despite the Russian engines, has a pretty good record launching commercial comm sats, and military payloads (recon sats probably).
Up until last week, Aviation Week worried about the Russian engines, and the possibility of the Russians cutting off the supply of engines in a tit for tat over Ukraine sanctions. And they said, several times, that the cost of developing a US built engine would be prohibitive. Well, last release to the popular (low information) press blamed the disaster on the Russian engines and announced that they would be replaced, with a yet to be named, US engine. Nothing like an explosion filmed in full color to expedite the decision making process.
Update: Nov 7 20014. Aviation Week came in this morning. Apparently I am wrong, there ARE two US rocket operations, both using Russian built engines. Aviation Week discusses both. ULA and Atlas use a big Russian engine still in production, Orbital Science and Antares are using an old Russian engine, going back to the 1960's. Sorry about the misinformation.
Labels:
Antares,
Atlas,
Orbital Sciences,
rocket crash,
ULA,
Wallops Island
Carpetbagger
That's what they called Scott Brown the day he joined the campaign. I heard it said, over and over again. I think that is the thing that tipped the election against him. Jean Shaheen didn't campaign much, she hasn't done much except vote in Obamacare. But she pulled it out in the end. Too bad. She is pretty much a do-nothing senator. I'm afraid I live in a no-think blue state. With yellow dog democrat voters that vote a straight party ticket no matter what, and no matter who is on the ticket.
Wednesday, November 5, 2014
Blue Hampshire
NH re elected three big spender, do-little democrats at the top of the ticket, despite a Republican year, good GOP candidates, and plenty of money. Looks like the takers are out voting the makers in NH. The rest of the country was smarter, although just barely. After six years of really awful democratic rule, the democrats still nearly won everywhere. Although the the national Republicans took control of the Senate, it's a thin majority, just two seats last time I looked, with Virginia still too close to call on the morning after. And few of the Republican victories were more than a couple of percent. I don't see a permanent and lasting change in the political complexion of the country here, the democrats could make a comeback just about anytime.
Especially if the Republican Congress fails to do anything about jobs, about the economy, ISIS, Keystone XL, Ebola, the VA, the IRS, the budget, taxes,the Ukraine, the deficit, and a lot of other stuff that has the voters hot and bothered. We have to survive a lame duck session of Congress where the Democratic Senate will likely try to pass a lot of stuff that will be dead when the new Congress convenes next year. Fortunately the House will be able to block a lot of this stuff if it keeps it's cool.
Congress ought to start in January on the Federal budget. They ought to pass appropriation bills for each executive department (Defense, State, Agriculture, Commerce, and so on). The democratic practice of letting appropriations slide until it's too late, and then passing one humungous continuing resolution, results in a stack of paperwork so thick that no one understands what's in it. The few savvy inside staffers who do understand what is going down have all the opportunity in the world to slip in pet pork spending that no one will every see, 'cause it's buried so deep.
The bennie of separate appropriation bills is the voters can tell how much money is getting spent on what. With the one humungous continuing resolution nobody knows how much money is going where.
Then Congress ought to pass a bill that says "Build Keystone XL pipeline now." Obama will hate it, but will he have the stones to veto it?
Then they ought to do something about ISIS, not sure just what, but we ought to figure out just what we are trying to do over there. Right now we are just putting on fireworks displays, which does nothing for our relations with anyone in the world. Makes us look stupid.
Especially if the Republican Congress fails to do anything about jobs, about the economy, ISIS, Keystone XL, Ebola, the VA, the IRS, the budget, taxes,the Ukraine, the deficit, and a lot of other stuff that has the voters hot and bothered. We have to survive a lame duck session of Congress where the Democratic Senate will likely try to pass a lot of stuff that will be dead when the new Congress convenes next year. Fortunately the House will be able to block a lot of this stuff if it keeps it's cool.
Congress ought to start in January on the Federal budget. They ought to pass appropriation bills for each executive department (Defense, State, Agriculture, Commerce, and so on). The democratic practice of letting appropriations slide until it's too late, and then passing one humungous continuing resolution, results in a stack of paperwork so thick that no one understands what's in it. The few savvy inside staffers who do understand what is going down have all the opportunity in the world to slip in pet pork spending that no one will every see, 'cause it's buried so deep.
The bennie of separate appropriation bills is the voters can tell how much money is getting spent on what. With the one humungous continuing resolution nobody knows how much money is going where.
Then Congress ought to pass a bill that says "Build Keystone XL pipeline now." Obama will hate it, but will he have the stones to veto it?
Then they ought to do something about ISIS, not sure just what, but we ought to figure out just what we are trying to do over there. Right now we are just putting on fireworks displays, which does nothing for our relations with anyone in the world. Makes us look stupid.
Tuesday, November 4, 2014
Election Day.
We won't know much until the polls close and some results trickle in. It was cold, 42F, at 8 AM when the polls opened. I wore long woolen underwear, Smart Wool socks, a ski sweater and parka, and it was still cold. I stood at the polls with signs for the Republican candidates till afternoon. It had warmed up a little, 52F, by 12:30.
Turnout was surprisingly heavy. As heavy as any presidential year, maybe higher. Constant stream of voters all day.
We won't know anything until much later tonight.
Turnout was surprisingly heavy. As heavy as any presidential year, maybe higher. Constant stream of voters all day.
We won't know anything until much later tonight.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)