This blog posts about aviation, automobiles, electronics, programming, politics and such other subjects as catch my interest. The blog is based in northern New Hampshire, USA
Monday, January 11, 2016
No way is Obama's justice department gonna indict Hillary
Doesn't matter what the FBI finds. Indicting Hillary will go a long way to electing a Republican president, who will undo as much of Obama's work as he can. Obama cannot want that. The Fox newsies are talking up FBI work on Hillary's secret emails on the private server. Now they are talking about corruption charges to go along with the classified flap. Ain't gonna happend, Obama won't let it.
Sunday, January 10, 2016
Chinese pressure on the NORKs
I hear TV newsies talking about this. The question is what can we do about the NORK nuclear weapons program. The answer from a number of newsies is to get the Chinese to apply pressure on the Kim regime to back off on the nuclear program. Sounds good.
But it won't work. The Chinese don't dare apply any serious pressure, such as cutting off their economic support. North Korea is in such tough shape that only shipments of fuel and food from China keep it running. The Chinese fear that cutting the shipments would destabilize the Kim regime, leading to a total collapse. North Korean agriculture is so screwed up that it cannot feed their people, and their industry is so feeble that they have invited the South Korean to set up maquiladoras in the north to employ some of their people. The only things keeping the Kim regime in power are the secret police and the army. Should either of these fail in a clutch, North Korea comes undone.
The Chinese don't want this. They would loose their buffer state between China and bustling prosperous and pro American South Korea. They fear that the South Koreans would subvert Chinese citizens away from communism and the one true way of Mao Tsetung. Plus giving the Americans listening posts and air bases right on their border rather than way off down south on the 38th parallel.
I cannot see China risking the loss of the Kim regime just to make the Americans happy.
But it won't work. The Chinese don't dare apply any serious pressure, such as cutting off their economic support. North Korea is in such tough shape that only shipments of fuel and food from China keep it running. The Chinese fear that cutting the shipments would destabilize the Kim regime, leading to a total collapse. North Korean agriculture is so screwed up that it cannot feed their people, and their industry is so feeble that they have invited the South Korean to set up maquiladoras in the north to employ some of their people. The only things keeping the Kim regime in power are the secret police and the army. Should either of these fail in a clutch, North Korea comes undone.
The Chinese don't want this. They would loose their buffer state between China and bustling prosperous and pro American South Korea. They fear that the South Koreans would subvert Chinese citizens away from communism and the one true way of Mao Tsetung. Plus giving the Americans listening posts and air bases right on their border rather than way off down south on the 38th parallel.
I cannot see China risking the loss of the Kim regime just to make the Americans happy.
Saturday, January 9, 2016
The Weapon Shops of Isher by A.E. Van Vogt
Classic science fiction published in the early 1950's, say 65 years ago. The Weapons Shops sold fabuluous firearms, which among their other miraclous properties, would only fire when held by their rightful owner. That was science fiction.
Today we have Obama calling for the invention and production of such weapons. But would anyone buy them? Most people, myself included, want a firearm that will reliably go bang when the trigger is pressed. We don't even trust safeties, every shooter can remember the time he missed a shot because the safety was still on. Which accounts for the popularity of the Glock handgun, it has no safeties.
If we don't trust simple mechanical safeties, who is gonna trust some micro processor based system that has to recognize who is holding the gun and prevent it from firing if it is in the wrong hands? Not me.
I suppose such Weapons Shop magic might work off a finger print sensor on the grip or an RFID tag carried by the rightful owner. All of which stops working when the battery runs down. To say nothing of gloves foiling the fingerprint sensor, or the owner forgetting to have the RFID tag on his person, plus a bunch of other Murphy's law failures.
I'm surprised that a president of the US can call for science fiction devices and nobody laughs at him.
Today we have Obama calling for the invention and production of such weapons. But would anyone buy them? Most people, myself included, want a firearm that will reliably go bang when the trigger is pressed. We don't even trust safeties, every shooter can remember the time he missed a shot because the safety was still on. Which accounts for the popularity of the Glock handgun, it has no safeties.
If we don't trust simple mechanical safeties, who is gonna trust some micro processor based system that has to recognize who is holding the gun and prevent it from firing if it is in the wrong hands? Not me.
I suppose such Weapons Shop magic might work off a finger print sensor on the grip or an RFID tag carried by the rightful owner. All of which stops working when the battery runs down. To say nothing of gloves foiling the fingerprint sensor, or the owner forgetting to have the RFID tag on his person, plus a bunch of other Murphy's law failures.
I'm surprised that a president of the US can call for science fiction devices and nobody laughs at him.
Friday, January 8, 2016
Cars, Cars, and more cars
NPR this morning said that 17.5 million new cars had been sold in 2015. Damn, that's a lotta wheels. There was a time, back in the 60s, when a 5 million car year was considered good. And consider that a car easily lasts 10 years these days. Keep up a 17.5 million a year sales rate for 10 years, and you have 175 million cars on the road. For a population of 300 and some million. That's a car for every two citizens.
Then the NPR greenies went on to wail about the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE). The sales figure are "cars and light trucks" and light trucks are selling well. The light trucks (SUVs count as light trucks), get about 20 mpg at best, the little econobox cars might get 35. Obama wants 50 mpg in a few years. I got news for him. We won't ever have a 50 mpg CAFE except by lying. We do some of that already, flex fuel (gasoline or alcohol) cars give the CAFE a big boost just by bureaucratic fiat.
Was I Detroit, I'd make all my production "flex fuel" because it's easy and cheap to do, and I get all sorts of CAFE improvement for every flex fuel vehicle produced. Just a little attention to gasket materials in the fuel system, using only gaskets that are alcohol proof, a bit more code in the microprocessor to recognize the fuel and for alcohol program the injectors to throw in a good deal more than for gasoline, and presto chango, I have a flex fuel vehicle. Good for a 20 mph bump in my CAFE.
Then the NPR greenies went on to wail about the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE). The sales figure are "cars and light trucks" and light trucks are selling well. The light trucks (SUVs count as light trucks), get about 20 mpg at best, the little econobox cars might get 35. Obama wants 50 mpg in a few years. I got news for him. We won't ever have a 50 mpg CAFE except by lying. We do some of that already, flex fuel (gasoline or alcohol) cars give the CAFE a big boost just by bureaucratic fiat.
Was I Detroit, I'd make all my production "flex fuel" because it's easy and cheap to do, and I get all sorts of CAFE improvement for every flex fuel vehicle produced. Just a little attention to gasket materials in the fuel system, using only gaskets that are alcohol proof, a bit more code in the microprocessor to recognize the fuel and for alcohol program the injectors to throw in a good deal more than for gasoline, and presto chango, I have a flex fuel vehicle. Good for a 20 mph bump in my CAFE.
Thursday, January 7, 2016
Particles: Nova's story of the Higgs Boson and Large Hadron Collider
Nova on NPR ran this show. The subject matter is fascinating, the mysterious "God Particle", the biggest particle accelerator ever built. Claims to discover the basis of "the standard model" or the fundamentals of space time.
The TV show had a lot of shots of physicists and bigwigs partying and drinking champagne to celebrate major milestones. Some cool shots of big pipes running down endless tunnels. Shots of physicists bicycling to and from work.
It did not explain what the Higgs boson is, or why we expected it to exist. No mention of the boson's mass, electric charge, spin, lifetime, or how we would detect one, should one form. No discussion of the accelerator, what keeps the particle beam on course running down the pipes. No discussion of what fields are used to accelerate the particles down the 50 mile radius particle racetrace. No mention of how close to the speed of light the particle speed reached. No mention of how the accelerator compensated for the growth of particle mass as the speed of light is approached. No mention of what particles were accelerated, I assume protons, but it would be nice to know. CERN had a serious accident in the early days, the particle beam came off the track and burned a hole thru the wall of the vacuum chamber. They didn't bother to show the damaged piece of pipe up close. The camera swept over a stack of pipes, one of them was burned black on the outside, but that was it.
They interviewed a number of the physicists, but they all talked about metaphysics, what it means, what it might mean, the goodness of doing it. That ain't science. Science is observations and measurements tied together with theory. Nobody talked science.
Really too bad. I guess the TV show producers know little science themselves , and don't care much about it.
The TV show had a lot of shots of physicists and bigwigs partying and drinking champagne to celebrate major milestones. Some cool shots of big pipes running down endless tunnels. Shots of physicists bicycling to and from work.
It did not explain what the Higgs boson is, or why we expected it to exist. No mention of the boson's mass, electric charge, spin, lifetime, or how we would detect one, should one form. No discussion of the accelerator, what keeps the particle beam on course running down the pipes. No discussion of what fields are used to accelerate the particles down the 50 mile radius particle racetrace. No mention of how close to the speed of light the particle speed reached. No mention of how the accelerator compensated for the growth of particle mass as the speed of light is approached. No mention of what particles were accelerated, I assume protons, but it would be nice to know. CERN had a serious accident in the early days, the particle beam came off the track and burned a hole thru the wall of the vacuum chamber. They didn't bother to show the damaged piece of pipe up close. The camera swept over a stack of pipes, one of them was burned black on the outside, but that was it.
They interviewed a number of the physicists, but they all talked about metaphysics, what it means, what it might mean, the goodness of doing it. That ain't science. Science is observations and measurements tied together with theory. Nobody talked science.
Really too bad. I guess the TV show producers know little science themselves , and don't care much about it.
Labels:
CERN,
Higgs Boson,
Large Hadron Collider,
Nova,
NPR. Particles
Washing Windows 8, yet again
Killing off crapware, specifically hpservice.exe. This baby shows up in Task Manager as a "process", ie a program loaded into ram and running, but does not show a window to control it or observe results. I tried to DISABLE it in task managers startup tab. Did not work, when I powered up next day hpservice.exe was still running. Net searching had told me that hpservice.exe was not a regular Windows service but just got loaded by a key in the registry. So I started up regedit (more difficult to do in Win 8 than in XP) and searched for a key that said "run" or "runonce" and the hpservice.exe name. No dice. Could not find the desired key let alone zap it.
Went back to Task Manager, and yup, the SOB was still there, big as life. Some fumbling around and I tried "Control Panel"," Administrative Tools", "Services" And there it was, a service, set to "AUTOMATIC" start, which means load and run every time the computer boots up. I changed that to "DISABLED".
I checked for hpservices in Task Manager this morning, and he is dead and gone.
Moral of story: Don't believe everything you see on the net.
And, Win 8 works just fine without hpservice.exe.
Went back to Task Manager, and yup, the SOB was still there, big as life. Some fumbling around and I tried "Control Panel"," Administrative Tools", "Services" And there it was, a service, set to "AUTOMATIC" start, which means load and run every time the computer boots up. I changed that to "DISABLED".
I checked for hpservices in Task Manager this morning, and he is dead and gone.
Moral of story: Don't believe everything you see on the net.
And, Win 8 works just fine without hpservice.exe.
Labels:
HP Pavilion Laptop,
hpservices.exe,
Regedit,
task manager
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)