Burn a flag in most places and you WILL get punched out. Which is one reason why flags don't get burned very often. Why make life more complicated by passing laws?
And for the Supremes who have opined that flag burning is free speech. It ain't speech, it's action. Some how we have nine lawyers, men of pure speech, who don't understand the simple things in life, like the difference between talk and action.
This blog posts about aviation, automobiles, electronics, programming, politics and such other subjects as catch my interest. The blog is based in northern New Hampshire, USA
Tuesday, November 29, 2016
Publicity for vote recounts
I doubt very much that any number of recounts will change the election results. But one of the minor losing candidates is calling for them, and the MSM are giving her, and the recounts, as much publicity as The Donald ever got on campaign. (And The Donald got a lot of publicity from the MSM)
I wonder why the MSM is pushing this issue. Do they think it will weaken the Donald after inauguration? They are all so locked in to doing election stories that they want to stretch the election out some more? They are all so brainwashed that election stories are the only kind of story they know how to write?
I wonder why the MSM is pushing this issue. Do they think it will weaken the Donald after inauguration? They are all so locked in to doing election stories that they want to stretch the election out some more? They are all so brainwashed that election stories are the only kind of story they know how to write?
Who to send to Fidel Castro's funeral?
How about Al Sharpton and that football player Colin K-something-or-other?
Monday, November 28, 2016
Dark History: Vikings by Martin J. Dougherty
It's almost a coffee table book, nicely printed, nicely illustrated, if it was a few inches bigger it would make the coffee table class. The author is, or is writing for, Viking re-enactors or gamers, he doesn't write like an ordinary historian. It reads well, and tells the story of the Vikings the way most histories tell it, you can quote from the book and nobody is going to challenge your ideas. He talks about the famous names, Ragnar Lodbrog, Sven Forkbeard, Hrolf Ganger, Lief Ericsson, Harald Hardrada, Eric Bloodaxe. Nice discussion of things like clothing, farming, the gods of Asgard. I am enough of an amateur historian to have heard of most of the things in the book, but it's a fine introduction for folks unfamiliar with the Viking age.
Dougherty introduces us to the modern Russian historical controversies without taking sides. Viking traders on the way to Constantinople penetrated most of what is now European Russia. It's clear that the Viking culture had influence upon the lands and peoples of Russia. Modern Russian historians are reluctant to allow that Vikings are the founders of Russia. They like to emphasis the native slavic genius and downplay the influence of the Vikings. Since the relevant sites are all deep inside Russia, only available to Russian archeologists, there is little that Western writers can say with much authority.
All in all, a good read. It would be better if they gave some provenance to the numerous and lovely illustrations. They range from photos of ancient rune stones to a nice color illustration that I recognized from National Geographic magazine years ago. Giving the name of the illustrator and a date would add interest to the illustrations.
Dougherty introduces us to the modern Russian historical controversies without taking sides. Viking traders on the way to Constantinople penetrated most of what is now European Russia. It's clear that the Viking culture had influence upon the lands and peoples of Russia. Modern Russian historians are reluctant to allow that Vikings are the founders of Russia. They like to emphasis the native slavic genius and downplay the influence of the Vikings. Since the relevant sites are all deep inside Russia, only available to Russian archeologists, there is little that Western writers can say with much authority.
All in all, a good read. It would be better if they gave some provenance to the numerous and lovely illustrations. They range from photos of ancient rune stones to a nice color illustration that I recognized from National Geographic magazine years ago. Giving the name of the illustrator and a date would add interest to the illustrations.
Who will become Secretary of the Air Force?
USAF has a bunch of problem areas right now, pure Air Force issues that a new Tramp administration Air Force secretary will need to cope with. The on going and worsening cost overruns and schedule slippage on the F-35 fighter program. It's gotten so bad that Canada recently bailed out and will buy F-18's instead. There is more slippage and over runs on the KC-46 tanker program. ust starting up is a new strategic bomber (B-21) program. And a new air launched ground attack missile to serve as a penetration aid for that bomber. And the fighter pilot mafia keeps trying to kill off the A-10 program over the protests of the Army and the Marines. The creeping paralysis overtaking all new programs. In WWII we could move a new fighter from paper spec to mass production and into combat inside of a year. The F-35 program has been running for twenty years and the plane still isn't combat ready. Right now the gun won't fire, and the engines catch fire if the plane pulls more than 5.6 G.
New Air Force secretary has his work cut out for him.
New Air Force secretary has his work cut out for him.
I wonder how long it will take for the MSM
To find something, anything, to talk about besides the election. It's been two weeks and all they can talk about is the election. Will this last til New Years? til next Christmas? Who knows?
Part of the problem is the newsies know so little about anything, so they find it hard to write about just about anything. The election is simple to cover. All they have to do is read to polls over the air and then do some pontificating about the meaning of it all. They don't have to get out of their cushy offices, talk to people, take notes, find stuff out. That's hard work. Easier to just pontificate about the polls.
Could it be that nobody is left in the MSM who can write a story about anything except the election?
Part of the problem is the newsies know so little about anything, so they find it hard to write about just about anything. The election is simple to cover. All they have to do is read to polls over the air and then do some pontificating about the meaning of it all. They don't have to get out of their cushy offices, talk to people, take notes, find stuff out. That's hard work. Easier to just pontificate about the polls.
Could it be that nobody is left in the MSM who can write a story about anything except the election?
Tuesday, November 22, 2016
The Alcohol Mandate
Carl Icahn wrote an op ed in the Wall St Journal decrying the use a and abuse of Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs). These are some kinda chits that concern the addition of alcohol to gasoline before it is sold at the pump. I didn't fully understand Icahn's explanation of how the scam on RINs worked, but he claimed it was driving the smaller refineries out of business and leaving gasoline production to the majors and the big service station chains. Icahn is in the business and probably has it right.
More to the point, the entire alcohol in gasoline program is a scam. Beloved of greenies, who think it saves the planet, and of farmers who see a huge market for their corn, in actual fact, the program just raises the price of gasoline. Growing the corn and distilling it into alcohol consumes more gasoline and diesel (energy) than the alcohol provides. We would get more gasoline for less drilling if we just refined crude into gasoline and sold it.
Back when the alcohol in gasoline scam got started, the greenies were told that raising corn and distilling alcohol would save on crude oil production. So all the greenies, and Congresscritters who thought they could snare some greenie votes fell in line. And all the farmers who correctly saw that massive alcohol production would skyrocket the price of corn got on board, and between the two they had enough votes to slide the mandatory alcohol in gasoline program thru Congress. That was years ago.
The truth is, making alcohol consumes more gasoline and diesel than the alcohol conserves. And the bulk of us motorists (in America everyone is a motorist) are stuck with a program that raises the cost of gasoline. We ought to abolish the whole thing, RINs and all. Maybe the Trump administration will do something about it.
More to the point, the entire alcohol in gasoline program is a scam. Beloved of greenies, who think it saves the planet, and of farmers who see a huge market for their corn, in actual fact, the program just raises the price of gasoline. Growing the corn and distilling it into alcohol consumes more gasoline and diesel (energy) than the alcohol provides. We would get more gasoline for less drilling if we just refined crude into gasoline and sold it.
Back when the alcohol in gasoline scam got started, the greenies were told that raising corn and distilling alcohol would save on crude oil production. So all the greenies, and Congresscritters who thought they could snare some greenie votes fell in line. And all the farmers who correctly saw that massive alcohol production would skyrocket the price of corn got on board, and between the two they had enough votes to slide the mandatory alcohol in gasoline program thru Congress. That was years ago.
The truth is, making alcohol consumes more gasoline and diesel than the alcohol conserves. And the bulk of us motorists (in America everyone is a motorist) are stuck with a program that raises the cost of gasoline. We ought to abolish the whole thing, RINs and all. Maybe the Trump administration will do something about it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)