We gotta remember that Kim isn't very bright, isn't very brave, and isn't very well informed. I don't think he has ever visited the US. Does he even speak or read English? His ideas of what we might do are formed from the Communist propaganda he must have been raised on, and eight years of Obama's opaque weasel words and red lines.
It's right and proper for Trump to tell him "You nuke anyone and we will nuke you down to bedrock," Kim may not have understood this before Trump said it. Even if Kim didn't catch on this time, I bet there are some people in the regime that did.
It will make them cautious. That is a good thing.
This blog posts about aviation, automobiles, electronics, programming, politics and such other subjects as catch my interest. The blog is based in northern New Hampshire, USA
Friday, August 11, 2017
Thursday, August 10, 2017
If someone knocked on my bedroom door at 5 AM
I'd shoot. I keep a .45 in my bedside table. Anyone inside my house without my permission at 5 AM is a bad guy. This happened to Paul Manaport yesterday. The FBI raided his house in DC "before dawn" according to accounts. Presumable they defeated his door locks and entered his house. That's breaking and entering in my book, and I'd shoot right thru the bedroom door. Unless their body armor is good enough to stop .45, they are dead.
The two party system needs some carrots and sticks
The two party system is an improvement over the multi party system. For any political issue there are always 6 or 7 different policies to deal with it. If you have 6 or 7 different parties, Murphy's Law guarantees that each party will take a different policy, none of them will have enough votes to push their policy thru, and so nothing gets done. For historical examples, look at Britain and France during the 19th century. Britain was steady two party. France was lots and lots of parties, every party for itself.
In two party system the party leadership decide which of the 6 or 7 options to take (or invents yet another one more palatable to the party members) and when the vote comes, the entire party puts all it's votes on one option and it will pass. Things happen. Progress occurs.
To make this work, the party leadership needs to get all the party members on board. Good policies help, good leadership speeches help, but when push comes to shove, the party leadership needs to be able to say," Vote with the party and these good things will come to you. Buck us and these bad things will happen to you."
Used to be, Congressional leadership could offer (or deny) desirable committee assignments, and juicy pork for your district. And money and presidential support in your next campaign. Or money and presidential support to your primary opponent.
Now, not so much. I forget the details, but the good government types have taken away the leadership's absolute control of committee assignments. The Republicans outlawed "earmarks" special bills giving money to special causes. Nobody is sure that they even want Donald Trump's support in their 2018 campaign. And so, poor old McConnell tried hard but he couldn't get all the RINO's and rightwing screwballs on board for repeal and replace. Perhaps he could have made it with a few more carrots and sticks in his hand to bring members into line.
Next time the good government types are out there pushing some reform that weakens the leadership's incentives, maybe we ought to vote 'em down.
In two party system the party leadership decide which of the 6 or 7 options to take (or invents yet another one more palatable to the party members) and when the vote comes, the entire party puts all it's votes on one option and it will pass. Things happen. Progress occurs.
To make this work, the party leadership needs to get all the party members on board. Good policies help, good leadership speeches help, but when push comes to shove, the party leadership needs to be able to say," Vote with the party and these good things will come to you. Buck us and these bad things will happen to you."
Used to be, Congressional leadership could offer (or deny) desirable committee assignments, and juicy pork for your district. And money and presidential support in your next campaign. Or money and presidential support to your primary opponent.
Now, not so much. I forget the details, but the good government types have taken away the leadership's absolute control of committee assignments. The Republicans outlawed "earmarks" special bills giving money to special causes. Nobody is sure that they even want Donald Trump's support in their 2018 campaign. And so, poor old McConnell tried hard but he couldn't get all the RINO's and rightwing screwballs on board for repeal and replace. Perhaps he could have made it with a few more carrots and sticks in his hand to bring members into line.
Next time the good government types are out there pushing some reform that weakens the leadership's incentives, maybe we ought to vote 'em down.
We must be doing something right No. 7
Forbes just did a ranking of all 50 states for taxes. Worst was New York at around 12%. Far far better is good old New Hampshire at Number 7 with an 8% tax rate. We are the best in New England by a lot. Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Maine are all far worse.
If we could just pass right to work up here we could even attract some industry, like that Toyota plant that is out looking for a location.
If we could just pass right to work up here we could even attract some industry, like that Toyota plant that is out looking for a location.
Wednesday, August 9, 2017
Opioid Crisis Part II
They had a big meeting about it at Trump's place in NJ. Lotta talk. Promises to crack down with law enforcement. Pleas for more money for treatment and drug rehab.
No mention of reforming doctors' prescription policies. Right now we lack any kinda guideline on what medical conditions justify the use of opoids, how much to prescribe, how to prevent doctor shopping. A lot of patients actually are suffering from various mental conditions, often depression. They find that a good solid hit of opioids makes them feel better. So they search out a pain pill mill and get a prescription for opioids. And some time or other they find that street heroin works as well and costs less. I think we need to tighten up on opioid prescriptions.
Clamp down on doctors. Doctors hate this.
No mention of reforming doctors' prescription policies. Right now we lack any kinda guideline on what medical conditions justify the use of opoids, how much to prescribe, how to prevent doctor shopping. A lot of patients actually are suffering from various mental conditions, often depression. They find that a good solid hit of opioids makes them feel better. So they search out a pain pill mill and get a prescription for opioids. And some time or other they find that street heroin works as well and costs less. I think we need to tighten up on opioid prescriptions.
Clamp down on doctors. Doctors hate this.
Tuesday, August 8, 2017
Dealing with the NORKS
It is easier to deal with them BEFORE they get nuclear tipped missiles with the range to strike Japan, South Korea, and America. Doing regime change on a nuclear armed regime can be very dangerous.
And the NORKs are really close to having such missiles. I don't think they have them today, but it looks like they will have them in a year or two.
And the NORKs are really close to having such missiles. I don't think they have them today, but it looks like they will have them in a year or two.
Monday, August 7, 2017
The Wind and the Lion 1975
An oldie but a goodie. I popped my video tape into my yard sale VCR and played it last night. It's still a good flick. Sean Connery is The Rasuli, "last of the Barbary pirates". Candice Bergen is Eden Pedicaris, American widow with two young children living in Morocco in 1904. The movie opens with The Rasuli's horseman galloping along a North Africa beach, gorgeous color, very scenic shots. He is out to create an international incident to support his cause by kidnapping Candice Bergen and her children. She is having afternoon tea, in a the formal garden of a plush house in Morocco with a very proper English gentleman. Very civilized scene. He is wearing a white suit with tie. Suit matches his white hair. They are discussing the proper wine to drink at this time of day. Quick change of pace, The Rasuli, followed by a dozen horsemen come crashing thru the garden hedge and start laying about with swords. Our proper English gentleman turns out to be practical as well as proper. He produces a large revolver from his shoulder holster and starts blowing Arabs off their horses. He does pretty well until he runs out of ammunition and is slain.
There is a lot of riding and fighting and scenery for the rest of the movie. Lot's of priceless dialog between Sean Connery and Candice Bergen. Candice gives as good as she gets. Where Sean Connery is waxing poetic with quotations from the Koran, Candice Bergen tops each one with a Yankee saying such as "A stitch in time saves nine".
We get to see the Theodore Roosevelt administration reacting to this outrage. You get the impression that Teddy has as much pirate blood in his veins as The Rasuli. Plenty of people have criticized this movie for modifying actual history, but heh, it's movie, not a history lesson. Shakespeare did the same thing with English history and we like it. The plot sticks together and makes sense. The portrait of Teddy Roosevelt is vivid and in accordance with what I know of the period.
A fun watch. If you haven't seen it, try it, you'll like it.
There is a lot of riding and fighting and scenery for the rest of the movie. Lot's of priceless dialog between Sean Connery and Candice Bergen. Candice gives as good as she gets. Where Sean Connery is waxing poetic with quotations from the Koran, Candice Bergen tops each one with a Yankee saying such as "A stitch in time saves nine".
We get to see the Theodore Roosevelt administration reacting to this outrage. You get the impression that Teddy has as much pirate blood in his veins as The Rasuli. Plenty of people have criticized this movie for modifying actual history, but heh, it's movie, not a history lesson. Shakespeare did the same thing with English history and we like it. The plot sticks together and makes sense. The portrait of Teddy Roosevelt is vivid and in accordance with what I know of the period.
A fun watch. If you haven't seen it, try it, you'll like it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)