Been a lotta talk on the 'Net and on the tube about Russians hacking the 2016 election, and what we oughta do about it. Step one is to dump the voting machines and go back to paper ballots. A voting machine is just a desktop computer running a special ballot program. It is subject to all the hacks that ordinary computers are subject to, which is too damn many.
Step two is safeguarding the voter lists. You know those lists they have at the polls and upon which they check off your name as you vote. And if your name isn't on the list you either have to do some extra paperwork, or you don't get to vote. Suppose the other side had used a program to go thru the voter's list and erase 10% of your party's voters? Or I can think of worse.
Best security would be to go back to keeping the voter's list with pen and ink. Barring that, if you just gotta have the list on computer, best would be not to use Windows. Windows is totally and irredeemably security compromised. It's Swiss cheese, fulla holes. Use a Mac, use Linux, use anything except Windows. Only allow one computer for updating the list, printing it out, and making backups. Keep that machine in a locked room to which only a very few have a key. DO NOT allow that machine to connect to any other machine, the public internet, the telephone network, anything. Do not allow anyone to insert flash drives, floppy disks, CD's or other media into the machine. Periodically do a backup of the voter list to CD-ROM. Store one copy of the backup CD-ROM off site so it will be available in the event of fire or flood at Town Hall. Periodically compare the master voter's list on the computer to the most recent backup and decide if the changes, and the amount of change is reasonable.
This blog posts about aviation, automobiles, electronics, programming, politics and such other subjects as catch my interest. The blog is based in northern New Hampshire, USA
Thursday, March 22, 2018
Tuesday, March 20, 2018
You gotta wonder about that FBI
Jeff Sessions just fired the FBI's number two man, Antony McCabe, based upon the FBI inspector general's written recommendation. Just to make it hurt a little more, McCabe was within hours of retirement, with a full pension. Getting fired means no pension, a pretty harsh penalty.
Question, if McCabe was such a crumb bum, how did he rise so far in the FBI? I assume McCabe joined the FBI twenty years ago as a junior agent, or what ever the FBI calls new troops. Since over twenty years, he got himself promoted up to number two at the Bureau, he must have had a lot of supervisors writing good performance reports on him over the years. Is it a case of a good guy turning bad in his later years? Or is it case of a lot of McCabe's supervisors thinking McCabe's way of doing things was good? That in fact a lot of the Bureau's supervision is just like McCabe? And that maybe some more weeding out is in order?
Question, if McCabe was such a crumb bum, how did he rise so far in the FBI? I assume McCabe joined the FBI twenty years ago as a junior agent, or what ever the FBI calls new troops. Since over twenty years, he got himself promoted up to number two at the Bureau, he must have had a lot of supervisors writing good performance reports on him over the years. Is it a case of a good guy turning bad in his later years? Or is it case of a lot of McCabe's supervisors thinking McCabe's way of doing things was good? That in fact a lot of the Bureau's supervision is just like McCabe? And that maybe some more weeding out is in order?
Monday, March 19, 2018
Don't Fire Mueller
The lefties have been drum beating for Trump to fire special prosecutor Robert Mueller. If Trump were so foolish as to do so, it would convince an awful lot of voters that Trump has something to hide. That he is dirty.
I like to think that Trump understands this and that he is smart enough to avoid shooting himself in the foot. Let's hope.
I like to think that Trump understands this and that he is smart enough to avoid shooting himself in the foot. Let's hope.
Sunday, March 18, 2018
Beat the Press
They were at it again this morning. Lotta talk about firing that FBI guy, Tony something-or-other. More talk about Trump's tweets, investigations into Russian collusion, and that Pittsburgh special election that the Democrats won by a hair.
No talk about dealing with the NORKS, Trump's tax bill, the steel and aluminum tariffs, dealing with the Russians. Does this mean that the Democrats think these subjects make Trump look good? So they don't talk about them?
No talk about dealing with the NORKS, Trump's tax bill, the steel and aluminum tariffs, dealing with the Russians. Does this mean that the Democrats think these subjects make Trump look good? So they don't talk about them?
Saturday, March 17, 2018
Puerto Rican bonds are hot on Wall St this year
Cannot understand why. Puerto Rico is broke. They will never have enough revenue to pay off their bonds. In fact they have declared bankruptcy, after getting a special act of Congress allowing them to do so, and a bankruptcy judge will decide how much (how little) the bond holders might get paid, if Puerto Rico ever comes up with some cash. Which they probably cannot do.
So why does a Puerto Rican bond have any value what so ever on the Street? Inquiring minds want to know.
So why does a Puerto Rican bond have any value what so ever on the Street? Inquiring minds want to know.
The New Hampshire Death Penalty
Concord is all hot and bothered about repealing the death penalty. I wonder why. NH hasn't executed anyone since 1939, nearly eighty years ago. We have one cop killer on death row right now. He has been there for ten years, with lawyers billing the state for ten years of appeals and foo for raw.
Could it be that our gallant state reps and senators have found a headline grabbing issue, that doesn't require any funding, and are playing it for publicity?
Could it be that our gallant state reps and senators have found a headline grabbing issue, that doesn't require any funding, and are playing it for publicity?
Friday, March 16, 2018
That Miami bridge collapse
It got a lot of TV coverage yesterday and the TV newsies are still going on about it today. I gather that the bridge was a prefab and newly installed. No mention of the installing contractor's name. Far as I am concerned the guys who installed it are liable if it falls down within a week. Also no mention of the company that made the prefab bridge. When sued, the installer will claim his people did everything right but the prefab bridge was defective in design or manufacture.
Either the TV newsies are so ignorant as not to understand the liability issues here, or they are being paid off to keep it quiet. Trust worthy those newsies are.
Either the TV newsies are so ignorant as not to understand the liability issues here, or they are being paid off to keep it quiet. Trust worthy those newsies are.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)