They will immediately start to impeach President Trump. All they need is a simple majority in the House to impeach. They need a 2/3rds majority in the Senate to convict, which they probably won't have. So about a year will go by with only impeachment proceedings, testimony, votes, and procedural maneuvering. The newsies will eat it up and cover nothing else. In short, the federal government will be paralyzed for a year or more. Nothing else will get done in DC. In the bitter end, the Democrats won't have the Senate votes to convict, and so the whole exercise will be in vain.
So, unless you are a deep dyed yellow dog Democrat, you ought to vote Republican this fall, just to permit the federal government to operate at all. Votes for Democrats are votes to stop all government activity.
Despite what you may think of Trump, you gotta admit that GNP growth is up from Obama's miserable 1.5% to nearly 3%. Unemployment is way down, 3.8%. Stock market is up. Wages are up. Taxes are down. These are all good things.
This blog posts about aviation, automobiles, electronics, programming, politics and such other subjects as catch my interest. The blog is based in northern New Hampshire, USA
Wednesday, June 6, 2018
Tuesday, June 5, 2018
Baking a cake for a Gay wedding
This case has been stumbling along for 6 years now. Generating billable hours for lawyers. Got all the way to the Supremes yesterday to little good. The Supremes did hold that the Colorado people had been mean to the baker, and displayed hostility to religion, and the baker should be let off oin this one case. For all this legal mickey motion, sucking up 6 years and countless legal bills, no new broad principle of law came out of it. We can expect more years of profitable lawyering, at tax payer expense, on this issue.
What I would like to see is a law that says caterers, contractors, the self employed, people rendering custom services, cakes, photographs, music, hair care, flowers, don't have to serve customers they don't want to serve. They are different from retailers, restaurants, hotels, motels, gas stations, railroads, airlines, and bus companies, who are rightly obligated to serve everyone who walks in their door. These people are rendering custom services which makes them into supporters of the customer served. The baker felt that by baking a custom cake for a gay couple, he was supporting gay marriage. Which is understandable on the bakers part.
What I would like to see is a law that says caterers, contractors, the self employed, people rendering custom services, cakes, photographs, music, hair care, flowers, don't have to serve customers they don't want to serve. They are different from retailers, restaurants, hotels, motels, gas stations, railroads, airlines, and bus companies, who are rightly obligated to serve everyone who walks in their door. These people are rendering custom services which makes them into supporters of the customer served. The baker felt that by baking a custom cake for a gay couple, he was supporting gay marriage. Which is understandable on the bakers part.
Monday, June 4, 2018
Victory At Sea
Shortly after World War II, NBC television created the Victory at Sea documentary, and aired it in the very early 1950's. I can remember watching episodes of it from a 14 inch portable TV on rabbit ears. NBC got Richard Rogers, of the famous Rogers and Hammerstein Broadway show business, to do the musical score. Back in the day you could buy LP records of just the score. The documentary makers picked the best of thousands of feet of news reel film, added Roger's score and some narration. They made better than 30 episodes.
I ran across a DVD set of the whole series in the $5 a DVD bin at Wallymart. Been playing it on evenings when I lack a new Netflix to watch. It's all black and white of course. Color film and just been invented but was so slow ( insensitive to light) that everybody shot the faster black and white film. And even the black and white film wasn't all that good. Lot of shots have the sunlit topsides of things over exposed (burned out white) and the shadows pure black. A fair amount of the footage is enemy footage captured during or after the war.
If you have children or grandchildren Victory at Sea is a good thing to show them. It moves right along, all the footage is genuine WWII footage, and there is plenty of action to keep a kid's interest. From what I hear, schools have pretty much giving up teaching history. WWII is the formative event of the 20th century. Watching this show, even just a few episodes of it will give the children an idea of the vastness of the war. Although this show emphasizes the Navy side of the war, it gives a fair showing to the land side of the conflict.
I ran across a DVD set of the whole series in the $5 a DVD bin at Wallymart. Been playing it on evenings when I lack a new Netflix to watch. It's all black and white of course. Color film and just been invented but was so slow ( insensitive to light) that everybody shot the faster black and white film. And even the black and white film wasn't all that good. Lot of shots have the sunlit topsides of things over exposed (burned out white) and the shadows pure black. A fair amount of the footage is enemy footage captured during or after the war.
If you have children or grandchildren Victory at Sea is a good thing to show them. It moves right along, all the footage is genuine WWII footage, and there is plenty of action to keep a kid's interest. From what I hear, schools have pretty much giving up teaching history. WWII is the formative event of the 20th century. Watching this show, even just a few episodes of it will give the children an idea of the vastness of the war. Although this show emphasizes the Navy side of the war, it gives a fair showing to the land side of the conflict.
Sunday, June 3, 2018
Irreversible. Wonder how that works? Really.
That's one of the American demands upon the NORKs. We want denuclearization that is irreversible. Just just how do we prevent the NORKs from deciding to scrap whatever deal they make and start up their nuclear program again? Even if we insist on daily no knock inspection of their nuclear sites, they can just create new secret sites, keep 'em secret, and go merrily on enriching uranium, making plutonium, and building bombs.
Saturday, June 2, 2018
Wants the Yankees to pick up his motel bill
Little Rocket Man doesn't have the cash to pay his own motel bill in Singapore? Wow. Talk about cheap cheap cheap. He wants us to pick up his tab. So far all he has managed is to convince all the Americans that he is broke, cheap, and a shameless panhandler.
The NORKs are a nation state. They can afford a nuclear program, a million man army, a ballistic missile program but they cannot afford their own motel bills? Come on.
The NORKs are a nation state. They can afford a nuclear program, a million man army, a ballistic missile program but they cannot afford their own motel bills? Come on.
Friday, June 1, 2018
All the News that fits we print
Fox News did a short peace on a new air vehicle, looked like an air car. Talked about it's use evacuating the wounded from the battlefield, and speeding civilian auto accident victims to the hospital. Mentioned that getting the wounded/victims to the hospital within one hour would greatly improve survival rates. Probably true.
They failed to give any useful information about the vehicle. They failed to give the name of this wonderful machine, or the name of the Israeli company developing it, or the name of the US company that might produce it. They didn't tell us the range of the vehicle. They didn't state the engine horsepower it uses to get airborne. They didn't state the payload. To be useful it has to be able to get off the ground with a single patient, and the pilot.
The thing might be a success if it had a 50 mile range, and could land and get airborne again with a 200 pound patient and and 200 pound pilot aboard. No indication of the capability of the flying prototype shown in the TV piece. The prototype might not have the range and payload to be a success, but if we knew how close it was to successful performance, we could form an idea of how far it has to go to make the grade and be a successful product. I assume the flying prototype they showed was a full scale prototype. But they didn't tell us that. It could have been a small scale model, a drone, no way I could tell watching TV. And the TV people didn't tell us what we were watching, full scale working prototype, or tiny model drone.
They failed to give any useful information about the vehicle. They failed to give the name of this wonderful machine, or the name of the Israeli company developing it, or the name of the US company that might produce it. They didn't tell us the range of the vehicle. They didn't state the engine horsepower it uses to get airborne. They didn't state the payload. To be useful it has to be able to get off the ground with a single patient, and the pilot.
The thing might be a success if it had a 50 mile range, and could land and get airborne again with a 200 pound patient and and 200 pound pilot aboard. No indication of the capability of the flying prototype shown in the TV piece. The prototype might not have the range and payload to be a success, but if we knew how close it was to successful performance, we could form an idea of how far it has to go to make the grade and be a successful product. I assume the flying prototype they showed was a full scale prototype. But they didn't tell us that. It could have been a small scale model, a drone, no way I could tell watching TV. And the TV people didn't tell us what we were watching, full scale working prototype, or tiny model drone.
Logan 2017
I missed it in theaters back in 2017. I got it on DVD thru Netflix. Not impressed. Although we have Hugh Jackman playing Logan, not much else is right. Logan has gone to seed, drinks too much and uses stuff. Drives an airport stretch limo, nicely washed and polished, but still a stretch limo. You would never catch me behind the wheel such an under powered, ungainly, hard to parallel park tank. Logan spends a fair bit of his time taking care of Charles Xavier, played by Patrick Stewart. Like Logan, Charles Xavier has gone to seed too. He no longer sees the whole of mankind's future, nor can he do anything about it. The plot, if any, never became clear to me, the movie just kinda rambled along, and never getting anywhere. If Logan or Charles Xavier was trying to accomplish anything, I never figured out what it might be.
Not the best X-man spinoff movie.
Not the best X-man spinoff movie.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)