The the cops, the FBI and the intelligence agencies submit thousands of requests to snoop on citizens and foreigners every year. The FISA court[s] approve all but a half dozen or so. In short, the cops and intel agencies get to snoop anyone they please, anytime they please. And a FISA snooping license allows them to tap your phone, intercept your email, see your Facebook page, and do other stuff that we don't even know about.
Since the FISA court[s] approve nearly all snooping requests why have them at all. Just let the cops and the intel agencies get on with it. The results are the same as we have right now.
What we really ought to do is require the cops and the agencies submit their snooping requests to real courts, the kind that do business five days a week and try real criminal cases, in front of real juries, and sentence real criminals.
This blog posts about aviation, automobiles, electronics, programming, politics and such other subjects as catch my interest. The blog is based in northern New Hampshire, USA
Sunday, December 15, 2019
Thursday, December 12, 2019
I'm not impressed. Is anyone impressed???
The Democrats invented a new one "Obstruction of Congress" to throw at Trump. First time I ever heard of this what-cha-may-callit. They asked the administration for pounds of paperwork and live witnesses to grill in front of the TV cameras. The administration refused the requests, probably citing executive privilege. I did not catch just what reasons the administration gave for refusals. For the other count they are going for "Abuse of power". They cite the famous Ukraine telephone call.
No real crime (like breaking and entering) was cited. Both counts are essentially government infighting counts. When the US is passing out foreign aid we often ask the lucky recipient to do a few things. If you want a handout from US taxpayers you need to be responsive. The Congress always asks for a ton of documents, it's easier than doing their own investigating. The administration always refuses to deliver papers except under court order. Things have worked this way in the federal government for a long time. I don't think we have enough here to impeach a president. I'm thinking there are a lot of people out there who feel the same way. I wonder if there are enough to stop it.
No real crime (like breaking and entering) was cited. Both counts are essentially government infighting counts. When the US is passing out foreign aid we often ask the lucky recipient to do a few things. If you want a handout from US taxpayers you need to be responsive. The Congress always asks for a ton of documents, it's easier than doing their own investigating. The administration always refuses to deliver papers except under court order. Things have worked this way in the federal government for a long time. I don't think we have enough here to impeach a president. I'm thinking there are a lot of people out there who feel the same way. I wonder if there are enough to stop it.
Tuesday, December 10, 2019
Do-Nothing US House claims "Progress" on USMCA
The Democrats are saying they have made progress on the
USMCA agreement. This is a NAFTA enhancement or replacement that the Trump
administration managed to negotiate with Canada
and Mexico last
year. It has been sitting in the US
House for a year while the House plays around with fun and games and
impeachment. Everyone, even AFL-CIO,
thinks it ought to pass.
The Democratic claim to have
amended the bill and made it better sounds like fake news to me. This is an international treaty, agreed to by
Canada and Mexico. I don’t think the US
house has the power to modify a treaty without getting Canada
and Mexico to
say OK. Which they probably won’t. Any changes dreamed up by Democrats in the US
House will make things better for the US
and worse for our trading partners.
So to show that the
do-nothing House is actually doing something, the Democrats now say they are
"making progress". I say they
are do-nothings until they actually vote to pass the USMCA. Which they should have done a year ago.
Sunday, December 8, 2019
Origin of Species. House cats are a species.
Those small furry carnivores who chase mice really ought to be classified into two distinct species. House cats have taken up with humans and get food and shelter from the humans, and alley cats who live out of doors. Anyone can see that the house cats are doing better than the alley cats. House cats are well fed, fur is nice and clean, they stay indoors, warm and dry during bad weather. Alley cats are skinny and ill fed, their coats are in terrible condition, and they have to survive out of doors in snow storms.
We used to think that house cats adopted their first humans back in ancient Egyptian times, say 5 to 6 thousand years ago. Lately a grave was excavated on Cyprus with a cat buried along with its human. This site was dated to 9000 years ago. But either date is not all that long ago, compared to dogs who have been domesticated for 50,000 years.
House cats, in addition to having the right attitude about people, have a couple of things that endear them to us humans. First of all, purring. We find a purring cat, sitting in our laps, creates a wonderful feeling of peace and warmth. And cats have the finest, silkiest coats of any common animal. It is a pleasure to stroke a cat, far more so than to stroke a dog which has a much coarser coat. Just how cats managed to evolve both purring and their silky coats, thousands of years before they adopted their first human, is a mystery that evolutionary theory fails to explain.
We used to think that house cats adopted their first humans back in ancient Egyptian times, say 5 to 6 thousand years ago. Lately a grave was excavated on Cyprus with a cat buried along with its human. This site was dated to 9000 years ago. But either date is not all that long ago, compared to dogs who have been domesticated for 50,000 years.
House cats, in addition to having the right attitude about people, have a couple of things that endear them to us humans. First of all, purring. We find a purring cat, sitting in our laps, creates a wonderful feeling of peace and warmth. And cats have the finest, silkiest coats of any common animal. It is a pleasure to stroke a cat, far more so than to stroke a dog which has a much coarser coat. Just how cats managed to evolve both purring and their silky coats, thousands of years before they adopted their first human, is a mystery that evolutionary theory fails to explain.
Saturday, December 7, 2019
Pearl Harbor was a massive Japanese screw up
The United States was solidly isolationist in the 1940's. We were determined not to get sucked into overseas wars, ever again. Even Franklin Roosevelt, perhaps the strongest US president of the 20th century, could not move the country toward intervention. He tried, and he could not do it.
Nothing the Japanese were doing in China and Southeast Asia could have caused America to do more than send them diplomatic nastygrams. No way were we going to do anything of a military nature about Japanese aggression in China. After the Germans defeated and occupied the Netherlands and France in 1940, the French and Dutch colonies were pretty much up for grabs. Japan could have kept on going after the American oil embargo by getting oil from the Dutch East Indies where the crude oil was so pure that it could be pumped into the tanks of warships without any refining.
Type 1 less provocative method, send a fleet of tankers with a strong (like really strong) naval escort and some bank guys with a good strong checkbook. Send the bankers ashore to negotiate a sale of oil.
Type 2 more provocative method, send a fleet and land marines and take over the place. We would have screamed and cried and threatened to hold our breath, but we would not have intervened militarily to save a Dutch colony. We did not approve of colonies. We still don't.
As long as the Japanese did not mess with American possessions like the Philippines or the US Navy, they could have done pretty much anything they liked in China and Indonesia. Japan's diplomats and intel people failed to clue the Japanese government into the real state of affairs in America at the time. (Or the government failed to listen to their diplomats and intel people.)
As it was, Pearl Harbor total destroyed American isolationism, we got good and mad, smashed the Nazis, and nuked Japan, after sending her fleet to the bottom. Total defeat and occupation. War outcomes don't get much worse than that.
Nothing the Japanese were doing in China and Southeast Asia could have caused America to do more than send them diplomatic nastygrams. No way were we going to do anything of a military nature about Japanese aggression in China. After the Germans defeated and occupied the Netherlands and France in 1940, the French and Dutch colonies were pretty much up for grabs. Japan could have kept on going after the American oil embargo by getting oil from the Dutch East Indies where the crude oil was so pure that it could be pumped into the tanks of warships without any refining.
Type 1 less provocative method, send a fleet of tankers with a strong (like really strong) naval escort and some bank guys with a good strong checkbook. Send the bankers ashore to negotiate a sale of oil.
Type 2 more provocative method, send a fleet and land marines and take over the place. We would have screamed and cried and threatened to hold our breath, but we would not have intervened militarily to save a Dutch colony. We did not approve of colonies. We still don't.
As long as the Japanese did not mess with American possessions like the Philippines or the US Navy, they could have done pretty much anything they liked in China and Indonesia. Japan's diplomats and intel people failed to clue the Japanese government into the real state of affairs in America at the time. (Or the government failed to listen to their diplomats and intel people.)
As it was, Pearl Harbor total destroyed American isolationism, we got good and mad, smashed the Nazis, and nuked Japan, after sending her fleet to the bottom. Total defeat and occupation. War outcomes don't get much worse than that.
Friday, December 6, 2019
"Identity Politics" is divisive and destructive of liberty.
A Democratic party speciality. Appeal to any kind of minority group you can think of (or invent). Do pitches aimed at blacks, Hispanics, gays, men, women, union workers, Indians, non-union workers, anybody. The essence of these tailored pitches is always "We will do nice things for you, at the expense of everybody else." and "You deserve some nice things to make up for past inequities." Identity politics violates Jefferson's statement "All men are created equal". Identity politicians are advocating unequal treatment of each little identity group.
Proper politicians advocate for things that improve life for everyone, not just some identity group. "We are all Americans together" is a better thing to say.
Proper politicians advocate for things that improve life for everyone, not just some identity group. "We are all Americans together" is a better thing to say.
Thursday, November 28, 2019
Shopping around for Cosequin for my cat
In was $30 for a white plastic bottle of 60 doses from a big pet store down in Concord. It is $18 for an envelope of 84 doses of a product called Dasuquin from my vet in Whitefield. Whitefield Animal Hospital on Rt 3, right on the steep grade on Rt 3 going north out of town. It is still doing my cat good, she goes outside more often, can jump up on furniture that she hasn't been able to manage for years, less limping as she slinks around the house.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)