The medics on TV seem more concerned with studies and papers
about Corona virus than they do
with curing patients. They seem to be
saying that by curing patients you upset their statistical studies of the
disease. I believe that doctors ought to
be curing patients, not collecting statistics and doing studies.
Back in sailing
ship days a British ship’s doctor came up with a cure for scurvy. He proved his cure worked with a double blind
experiment. Half the patients got his
cure and the other half got a fake (a placebo).
Neither the patient nor the doctor knew which was which to prevent
preconceptions from influencing the reported results. It was feared that the doctor writing up the
patient’s progress would be tempted to report that patients receiving the real
stuff were doing better than patients getting the placebo. Hence keeping the doctor ignorant (blind) improved
the objectivity of the experiment. It’s
good science, but it’s hard on the patients given the placebo. This "double blind" technique is still considered the proper way to test drugs and treatments now in the 21st century.
Anyhow, the medics
pontificating on TV about Corona
virus seem more interested in good science rather than curing patients. And the TV personalities seem more interested
in trashing President Trump for his favorable comments on hydroxyl chloroquine
than discussing how well it works.
Another strange
thing. Various bureaucrats, FDA, CDC,
and others, seem to think that doctors may not proscribe “off-label” uses of
drugs without their bureaucratic permission.
Me, I think the decision should lie with the doctor and patient, which
means mostly with the doctor. Most
patients cheerfully accept anything their doctor says is good for them. “You are the doctor” is the usual cliché.” As it is, doctors are reluctant to discuss
off label drug uses for fear of professional or bureaucratic retaliation.