Does it matter if the Nashville massacre is called a hate crime?

The shooter is clearly guilty of first degree murder.  That used to deserve the death penalty years ago, but Democrats and lawyers have almost eliminated the death penalty in America.  Why confuse things by calling it a hate crime instead of murder?

   And since the shooter was shot dead by the Nashville police, it doesn’t really matter.  We aren’t going to try the killer since she is already dead. 

   TV news spent a lot of time discussing this issue today. 

   I hear the shooter was undergoing some sort of “medical” procedure on account of her psychological problems.  I would love to learn the name of the doctor whose treatment was so tragically ineffective.  

It isn’t the guns, it’s the homicidal maniacs.

    The Nashville school shooting was horrible.  Three nine year olds are dead, shot by the shooter.  That is too terrible for words.  Three adult school staff members are dead, also shot by the shooter.  

   Biden is using this horrible case to call for more gun control, this time he wants to outlaw and confiscate all semi automatic rifles and pistols.  Most guns out there are semi automatic, so Biden is calling for confiscating everyone’s guns.

   Guns are not the problem and not the cause of the Nashville massacre.  The true cause is the large number of homicidal maniacs that we allow to run around loose.  We should have mental hospitals and homicidal maniacs should be involuntarily committed to a mental hospital until they are cured of their homicidal mania. 

   We used to do this back in the old days.  Unfortunately the 1960’s reformers declared that involuntary commitment was like putting people in jail without a proper trial.  The inmates were released to become homeless street people and the mental hospitals were closed.

   Until we round up the homicidal maniacs running around loose we will continue to have horrible shooting cases like Nashville.

 

 

 

Is Stanford a real law school?

Does it train its students to become real practicing lawyers out in the real world?  In the real world everyone, especially the lawyers, treat the judge with courtesy and respect.  A lawyer that interrupts the judge the way the Stanford students did would be declared in contempt of court.  The judge would have the court officers remove the offender from the court. Or the judge can sentence the offender to a prison term, right then and there.  In my estimation the Stanford students who shouted down the judge ought to be expelled from Stanford on the grounds that they will never become a real lawyer. 

Marketing Medicine

I see TV ads many times a day.  The medicine[s] always have a strange name, a made up word.  The TV doesn’t say what the magic medicine might cure.  They are not sold in stores, you have to order from the medicine’s website or telephone them.  If these magic medicines really worked I would think you could buy them in drug stores.  Since stores don’t carry them I have doubts that they actually do any good. 

“The Batman” movie 2022

Meh.  Two simple old fashioned techniques fail in The Batman.  The scenes are not lighted.  They are so dark the only character I could recognize was Batman himself, when he was wearing his costume. Other actors came and went, but I could not see them well enough to tell one from another.  All they had to do was turn on the lights.  Surely a movie budget can afford a little electricity. 

   And the curse of the soundman hits this movie hard.  The actors speak in stage whispers, or just too softly.  I failed to understand much of the spoken dialog.  Which makes it hard to follow what little plot the movie might have had.

   Things got so bad I stopped watching The Batman before it was halfway thru.    

 $32 million for a drone???

The TV says the USAF drone lost over the black sea cost $32 million.  You can buy a low end Russian jet fighter for that.  Gold plate much?? 

Silicon Valley Bank.

This bank had $200 billion plus in deposits, mostly from companies.  It had companies that deposited $20 billion apiece.  Sooner of later any half way competent company can find far more profitable uses for $20 billion, more profitable than leaving it in the bank.  When such a company withdraws $20 billion to do something it’s gonna shake the financial stability of the bank, even if it does have another $180 billion in the til. 

   I believe the thinking in bankers’ minds assumes that the depositors’ money is very small compared to the banks total assets.  And that they have a lot of depositors but they don’t all withdraw their deposits at the same time. 

  I’m thinking that Silicon Valley ignored all this and did not worry when big depositors made big withdrawals.

Biden promised to make all the depositors whole without laying the burden on taxpayers.  He is gonna have FDIC pay off everybody.  Of course FDIC gets its money from taxpayers, and $20 billion depositors take a lot of paying off.