This has come up in the Oklahoma beheading case. The TV newsies argue back and forth between "terrorism" and "workplace violence".
Me, I'd rather call it murder in the first degree. Murder is a well established crime, it's been a crime since Moses brought down the Ten Commandments, and that was a long time ago. The newer trendier crimes are vague, not well established, and subject to endless bickering by lawyers. Worse, they are thought crimes, depending upon the state of mind of the perp. I don't like thought crimes, men ought to be free to think anything they like, just so long as they keep their thoughts to them selves. Plus, proving thoughts in court is touchy, the perp merely denies thinking wrong thoughts.
Plus, terrorism is a political thought crime. One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Convict the perp of terrorism and bunches of unpleasant people will say that his cause was righteous, and he is a martyr to the cause. Convict the perp of first degree murder and it is harder to generate sympathy for him. And the penalties for murder are still quite drastic. Judge Neopolitano was on Fox a few minutes ago saying that under Oklahoma law, a conviction for murder is straight forward and quite possible, conviction for either "workplace violence" or "terrorism" is problematical . So let's go for murder.
The "workplace violence" just seems pretty wishy washy for cutting off a worker's head. Let's go with murder.
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
RD180 Rocket Engines
RD180 is the engine that powers the United Launch Alliance's (ULA) Atlas V heavy lift booster rocket. One little problem has emerged lately, the RD180 is made in Russia. Just how a Russian built engine became the main engine of an American booster is a little hard to tell, now. Tracks are being covered even as I write this. At a guess, the Russians were low bidders, and someone decided that they were a reliable supplier.
Anyhow, after the late unpleasantness in Ukraine, the Americans started huffing and puffing about "sanctions" and the Russians retaliated by threatening to cut off the supply of RD180 engines. Which would put the Atlas V and ULA out of business.
So, ULA is talking about having Blue Origin, a secretive Seattle based rocket company, started by Jeff Bezos the Amazon.com zillionaire, design and build an RD180 replacement engine right in Seattle. Dubbed BE-4, the engine would burn compressed natural gas and LOX and produce 550,000 pounds of thrust. Blue Origin has been doing some design work on BE-4 using in house (Jeff Bezos) funding. ULA has signed a deal to provide more funding. Target date for first flight is 2018, four years from now.
We have a stockpile of Russian built RD180 engines good for two years. I guess they are hoping that the Russians will sell us another couple of years worth of engines. Or, that with a LOT of more money the BE-4 could be rushed into production.
Or, we could drop ULA and Atlas V and use the Space-X Falcon 9 booster rocket which has roughly the same performance as Atlas V.
Anyhow, after the late unpleasantness in Ukraine, the Americans started huffing and puffing about "sanctions" and the Russians retaliated by threatening to cut off the supply of RD180 engines. Which would put the Atlas V and ULA out of business.
So, ULA is talking about having Blue Origin, a secretive Seattle based rocket company, started by Jeff Bezos the Amazon.com zillionaire, design and build an RD180 replacement engine right in Seattle. Dubbed BE-4, the engine would burn compressed natural gas and LOX and produce 550,000 pounds of thrust. Blue Origin has been doing some design work on BE-4 using in house (Jeff Bezos) funding. ULA has signed a deal to provide more funding. Target date for first flight is 2018, four years from now.
We have a stockpile of Russian built RD180 engines good for two years. I guess they are hoping that the Russians will sell us another couple of years worth of engines. Or, that with a LOT of more money the BE-4 could be rushed into production.
Or, we could drop ULA and Atlas V and use the Space-X Falcon 9 booster rocket which has roughly the same performance as Atlas V.
Monday, September 29, 2014
Navigating Windows 8.1
Two ways to make the Desktop easier to navigate.
First put up some Really Useful Icons. Namely Control Panel, Your files, Network, and My Computer (well M$ now calls it This PC) . Once up you can tweak, look at your files, look at system files, and look on the LAN with just one mouse click on the Desktop.
Next clear off the Desktop clutter. New computers come with all sorts of "helpful" applications cluttering your desktop. You have never heard of most of 'em, but you hate put them in the recycle bin 'cause you never know when you might want them. Create a new folder to hold them. I named the new folder "Craplets" and put it on the desk top. One day, when I have the time, I will research the craplets and decide if I want to run them or uninstall them (zap them). But in the mean time they are off my desktop.
How to?
1. Right Click on a blank portion of your Desktop (Shades of M$-DOS, typing magic words to the prompt). The Personalization Screen appears.
2. On the Personalization Screen left side, Click on Change Desktop Icons. The Desktop Icon Settings window appears.
3. Check all five boxes, Computer,User's Files, Network,, Recycle Bin, and Control Panel. Then click "Apply".
4. To make the icons stay put, uncheck "Allow Themes to Change Desktop Icons.
Once done, you find most of the useful functions of the late, lamented "Start Button" are now available on your Desktop. I found Win 8.1 less user hostile after doing this.
First put up some Really Useful Icons. Namely Control Panel, Your files, Network, and My Computer (well M$ now calls it This PC) . Once up you can tweak, look at your files, look at system files, and look on the LAN with just one mouse click on the Desktop.
Next clear off the Desktop clutter. New computers come with all sorts of "helpful" applications cluttering your desktop. You have never heard of most of 'em, but you hate put them in the recycle bin 'cause you never know when you might want them. Create a new folder to hold them. I named the new folder "Craplets" and put it on the desk top. One day, when I have the time, I will research the craplets and decide if I want to run them or uninstall them (zap them). But in the mean time they are off my desktop.
How to?
1. Right Click on a blank portion of your Desktop (Shades of M$-DOS, typing magic words to the prompt). The Personalization Screen appears.
2. On the Personalization Screen left side, Click on Change Desktop Icons. The Desktop Icon Settings window appears.
3. Check all five boxes, Computer,User's Files, Network,, Recycle Bin, and Control Panel. Then click "Apply".
4. To make the icons stay put, uncheck "Allow Themes to Change Desktop Icons.
Once done, you find most of the useful functions of the late, lamented "Start Button" are now available on your Desktop. I found Win 8.1 less user hostile after doing this.
Sunday, September 28, 2014
Congressional authorization to whack ISIS
Does Obama need it? Or does the 10 year old Authorization for the Used of Military Force (AUMF) that George Bush obtained to overthrow Saddam Hussein cover zapping ISIS in 2014. Who knows? Call in the lawyers and let them quibble.
Let's get real about the issue here. Obama is commander in chief, the armed forces will do what he orders them to. So Obama can order up air strikes, or anything else, and it will happen.
On the other hand, any president with two brain cells firing, wants to go to war, or something less than war, with Congressional, political and media support. Obama has already gotten funding for the anti ISIS effort into the "continuing resolution" a stop gap bill to fund the entire US government at least thru the new year. That's not too shabby for Obama. That will keep the bombs falling for a while.
If Obama isn't very serious about ISIS, and will settle for a few fireworks shows, no ground troops, that's probably all he needs. If he actually wants to zap ISIS into the next dimension, he probably wants to have a brand new AUMF that specifically names ISIS as the enemy.
To my way of thinking, there are only two reasons for NOT going to Congress for a new AUMF. One, Obama fears that Congress would vote it down, making him look weaker than he already looks. Two, Obama isn't really serious about ISIS, and doesn't actually plan on serious operations to wipe them out. Take your pick.
Let's get real about the issue here. Obama is commander in chief, the armed forces will do what he orders them to. So Obama can order up air strikes, or anything else, and it will happen.
On the other hand, any president with two brain cells firing, wants to go to war, or something less than war, with Congressional, political and media support. Obama has already gotten funding for the anti ISIS effort into the "continuing resolution" a stop gap bill to fund the entire US government at least thru the new year. That's not too shabby for Obama. That will keep the bombs falling for a while.
If Obama isn't very serious about ISIS, and will settle for a few fireworks shows, no ground troops, that's probably all he needs. If he actually wants to zap ISIS into the next dimension, he probably wants to have a brand new AUMF that specifically names ISIS as the enemy.
To my way of thinking, there are only two reasons for NOT going to Congress for a new AUMF. One, Obama fears that Congress would vote it down, making him look weaker than he already looks. Two, Obama isn't really serious about ISIS, and doesn't actually plan on serious operations to wipe them out. Take your pick.
Gold Plating hikes costs on KC-46
The KC-46 program is supposed to produce new jet tankers to replace the Eisenhower era KC-135 tankers that are still in service with the Air Force. It's a reasonable program to have, tankers get a LOT of use, and everything has a service life. The KC-135's have been flying, hard, for 60 years, and there comes a time when a new aircraft is indicated.
The idea was to buy Boeing 767 airliners, remove the seats, and install fuel tanks and a refueling boom. Take advantage of the well proven, reliable Boeing design, hundreds of which are still flying passengers today.
The Air Force couldn't resist the urge to gold plate. USAF has been into gold plating since I was in the service and that was a long time ago. USAF insisted on rewiring the entire plane. The new wiring scheme called for double and triple redundancy on a lot of circuits, and shielding and separation to prevent electrical crosstalk in the wire bundles. Boeing has built 6 aircraft and now, finally, the Air Force inspectors noticed that some of the new wiring wasn't up to spec. The commercial 767 had about 70 MILES of wire in it. The Air Force added another 50 MILES of wire.
The commercial 767 flies just fine, has been flying just fine for 20 years with the standard wiring system. There was no need to change anything. The Air Force insisted upon messing up a good thing, and it has bought them a 3 month program slippage. Good work USAF. My tax money at work.
The idea was to buy Boeing 767 airliners, remove the seats, and install fuel tanks and a refueling boom. Take advantage of the well proven, reliable Boeing design, hundreds of which are still flying passengers today.
The Air Force couldn't resist the urge to gold plate. USAF has been into gold plating since I was in the service and that was a long time ago. USAF insisted on rewiring the entire plane. The new wiring scheme called for double and triple redundancy on a lot of circuits, and shielding and separation to prevent electrical crosstalk in the wire bundles. Boeing has built 6 aircraft and now, finally, the Air Force inspectors noticed that some of the new wiring wasn't up to spec. The commercial 767 had about 70 MILES of wire in it. The Air Force added another 50 MILES of wire.
The commercial 767 flies just fine, has been flying just fine for 20 years with the standard wiring system. There was no need to change anything. The Air Force insisted upon messing up a good thing, and it has bought them a 3 month program slippage. Good work USAF. My tax money at work.
Saturday, September 27, 2014
Leaves are close to peak north of the Notch
Tomorrow will be a fine day for leaf peeping. Peak color doesn't last long.
Friday, September 26, 2014
Economic Growth in Northern NH
Maggie Hassan, incumbent Democratic governor, seeking re election, came to Littleton the other day. She got decent coverage in the freebie local paper, The Littleton Record. They quoted Maggie waxing rhapsodic about Littleton's economic improvements. She cited a multimillion dollar expansion at the hospital, and a second, smaller but still multimillion replacement of a public school building, and the famous Littleton main street rebuilding (they tore up all the paving on main street, rerouted a lot of sewer and water pipe, and then paved it over)
All this is cool, and needed to be done, but Maggie doesn't seem to understand that all this money spent is money spent on maintenance and services. Where is the money spent on new manufacturing plant, new mines, new farms, new electric generation, new ski areas, investment that makes stuff we can sell to pay the bills, to pay for new hospital expansion, and nice new school buildings? You have to make stuff to sell before you can afford health care and education and well paved streets.
Manufacturing and farming and mining and recreation create wealth. Hospitals schools and roads consume wealth. If you don't have the wealth, you cannot afford the goodies. And that is why our children, after graduating high school, leave the area to find jobs.
Maggie, like the average Democrat, doesn't understand the difference between weath creation and wealth consumption.
Vote for Walt Havenstein.
All this is cool, and needed to be done, but Maggie doesn't seem to understand that all this money spent is money spent on maintenance and services. Where is the money spent on new manufacturing plant, new mines, new farms, new electric generation, new ski areas, investment that makes stuff we can sell to pay the bills, to pay for new hospital expansion, and nice new school buildings? You have to make stuff to sell before you can afford health care and education and well paved streets.
Manufacturing and farming and mining and recreation create wealth. Hospitals schools and roads consume wealth. If you don't have the wealth, you cannot afford the goodies. And that is why our children, after graduating high school, leave the area to find jobs.
Maggie, like the average Democrat, doesn't understand the difference between weath creation and wealth consumption.
Vote for Walt Havenstein.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)