Bipartisan (n) or bipartisanship (adj). Noun or adjective. Generally perceived as a "good thing" or at least the pol using the word hopes that is what the voters perceive. At it's strongest, bipartisan is a code word meaning vote for my bill. A weaker form of the word means I will talk compromise with my political opponents rather that just yelling at them.
If a pol has nothing better to offer than bipartisanship, you ought to vote for the other guy.
This blog posts about aviation, automobiles, electronics, programming, politics and such other subjects as catch my interest. The blog is based in northern New Hampshire, USA
Wednesday, November 30, 2016
Secretary of State
I hope who ever Trump picks can manage the State Dept, a goofy bureaucracy stuffed full of democrats, know-it-alls, and peaceniks. They all have snivel service protection against firing. Many of them are scattered all over the world where it is harder to keep track of, and ride herd on them. Flinty old John Bolton might be able to handle them, but I'm doubtful of Romney, Guiliani, and Corker. Petraeius might be tough enough.
As it is, a lot of 'em are getting ready make leaks embarrassing to the incoming Trump administration, and the MSM are sitting up, wagging heir tails, and begging for some dirt to print.
Although the secretary of state cannot fire them, he could announce a policy of unaccompanied overseas tours in unpleasant places for State Dept leakers.
As it is, a lot of 'em are getting ready make leaks embarrassing to the incoming Trump administration, and the MSM are sitting up, wagging heir tails, and begging for some dirt to print.
Although the secretary of state cannot fire them, he could announce a policy of unaccompanied overseas tours in unpleasant places for State Dept leakers.
Tuesday, November 29, 2016
Do we really need a law against flag burning??
Burn a flag in most places and you WILL get punched out. Which is one reason why flags don't get burned very often. Why make life more complicated by passing laws?
And for the Supremes who have opined that flag burning is free speech. It ain't speech, it's action. Some how we have nine lawyers, men of pure speech, who don't understand the simple things in life, like the difference between talk and action.
And for the Supremes who have opined that flag burning is free speech. It ain't speech, it's action. Some how we have nine lawyers, men of pure speech, who don't understand the simple things in life, like the difference between talk and action.
Publicity for vote recounts
I doubt very much that any number of recounts will change the election results. But one of the minor losing candidates is calling for them, and the MSM are giving her, and the recounts, as much publicity as The Donald ever got on campaign. (And The Donald got a lot of publicity from the MSM)
I wonder why the MSM is pushing this issue. Do they think it will weaken the Donald after inauguration? They are all so locked in to doing election stories that they want to stretch the election out some more? They are all so brainwashed that election stories are the only kind of story they know how to write?
I wonder why the MSM is pushing this issue. Do they think it will weaken the Donald after inauguration? They are all so locked in to doing election stories that they want to stretch the election out some more? They are all so brainwashed that election stories are the only kind of story they know how to write?
Who to send to Fidel Castro's funeral?
How about Al Sharpton and that football player Colin K-something-or-other?
Monday, November 28, 2016
Dark History: Vikings by Martin J. Dougherty
It's almost a coffee table book, nicely printed, nicely illustrated, if it was a few inches bigger it would make the coffee table class. The author is, or is writing for, Viking re-enactors or gamers, he doesn't write like an ordinary historian. It reads well, and tells the story of the Vikings the way most histories tell it, you can quote from the book and nobody is going to challenge your ideas. He talks about the famous names, Ragnar Lodbrog, Sven Forkbeard, Hrolf Ganger, Lief Ericsson, Harald Hardrada, Eric Bloodaxe. Nice discussion of things like clothing, farming, the gods of Asgard. I am enough of an amateur historian to have heard of most of the things in the book, but it's a fine introduction for folks unfamiliar with the Viking age.
Dougherty introduces us to the modern Russian historical controversies without taking sides. Viking traders on the way to Constantinople penetrated most of what is now European Russia. It's clear that the Viking culture had influence upon the lands and peoples of Russia. Modern Russian historians are reluctant to allow that Vikings are the founders of Russia. They like to emphasis the native slavic genius and downplay the influence of the Vikings. Since the relevant sites are all deep inside Russia, only available to Russian archeologists, there is little that Western writers can say with much authority.
All in all, a good read. It would be better if they gave some provenance to the numerous and lovely illustrations. They range from photos of ancient rune stones to a nice color illustration that I recognized from National Geographic magazine years ago. Giving the name of the illustrator and a date would add interest to the illustrations.
Dougherty introduces us to the modern Russian historical controversies without taking sides. Viking traders on the way to Constantinople penetrated most of what is now European Russia. It's clear that the Viking culture had influence upon the lands and peoples of Russia. Modern Russian historians are reluctant to allow that Vikings are the founders of Russia. They like to emphasis the native slavic genius and downplay the influence of the Vikings. Since the relevant sites are all deep inside Russia, only available to Russian archeologists, there is little that Western writers can say with much authority.
All in all, a good read. It would be better if they gave some provenance to the numerous and lovely illustrations. They range from photos of ancient rune stones to a nice color illustration that I recognized from National Geographic magazine years ago. Giving the name of the illustrator and a date would add interest to the illustrations.
Who will become Secretary of the Air Force?
USAF has a bunch of problem areas right now, pure Air Force issues that a new Tramp administration Air Force secretary will need to cope with. The on going and worsening cost overruns and schedule slippage on the F-35 fighter program. It's gotten so bad that Canada recently bailed out and will buy F-18's instead. There is more slippage and over runs on the KC-46 tanker program. ust starting up is a new strategic bomber (B-21) program. And a new air launched ground attack missile to serve as a penetration aid for that bomber. And the fighter pilot mafia keeps trying to kill off the A-10 program over the protests of the Army and the Marines. The creeping paralysis overtaking all new programs. In WWII we could move a new fighter from paper spec to mass production and into combat inside of a year. The F-35 program has been running for twenty years and the plane still isn't combat ready. Right now the gun won't fire, and the engines catch fire if the plane pulls more than 5.6 G.
New Air Force secretary has his work cut out for him.
New Air Force secretary has his work cut out for him.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)