It's a great grandson. Cute, three weeks old as of Friday. Eats and sleeps well. Doesn't fuss much, and well he does, picking him up and walking around the house quiets him right down. Likes to nap in parent's (grandparent's too) laps. Laps are better than cradles, ask any new born. Has nice fine hair, looks to be blond or perhaps red. Not unusual considering the both mother and father are still blond.
Drove back from DC on Saturday. I took the scenic route. Picked up old US 1 off the Baltimore beltway. It dwindles to a two lane route thru Maryland farm country and gets over the Chesapeake Bay on top of the old Conowingo dam. Must have been low tide, the down stream side of the dam was going dry, lots of mud flats all across the bay. Upstream seemed to have plenty of water. Crossed the Mason-Dixon line in the Pennsylvania, and US-1 widens into a nice 4 lane divided highway, light traffic, clearly a 1950's road project. Zipped thru/by Chadd's Ford, the Wyeth art museum, Brandwine battle field, Longwood Gardens and picked up old US 202 for West Chester. PA has finally gotten some infrastructure finished. The construction on US 202 around King of Prussia is finally (after 10 years!!) finished. And they have fixed a bunch of bottle necks/bad spots along the way to NJ. They repaved using that old purple asphalt which looks nice and you don't see much of it around.
Got to Tappan Zee bridge at noon. The new Tappan Zee bridge is still under construction, although progress has been made. They have the steel girder work up clear across the Hudson, and the towers to support the cable stayed high center section are up. The old bridge is still there, traffic was moving quickly, all 10 lanes. The toll booth on the eastern shore is gone. I zipped right thru, no EZ Pass, either I got thru for free, or they got my license plate on a well hidden camera and will mail me a bill.
All and all, the scenic route is nearly as fast as the straight-thru I95 all the way route. Straight thru took ten hours in the rain. Senic route was only 10 1/2 hours in good weather. Saves about $20 in tolls.
Good trip. Got to love the grandson. Mom (Karen) and Dad (Justin) are looking fine and enjoying their first child.
This blog posts about aviation, automobiles, electronics, programming, politics and such other subjects as catch my interest. The blog is based in northern New Hampshire, USA
Sunday, April 30, 2017
Friday, April 28, 2017
Politics and Prose, Washington DC bookstore
I love to read, and the thought of visiting a bookstore bigger than the Village Bookstore in Littleton is always cool with me. So we loaded Wyatt into a carseat into the back of my Buick, and set off. It's a fair piece over there. Wyatt is OK with car trips, he slept all the way, and was perfectly happy in his baby pack walking around the bookstore.
It's big, and has an enormous stock. Their shelving policy can slow you down. Usually you shelve history books by date (of subject) so that revolutionary war books get shelved next to each other, likewise civil war books and so on. Not at Politics and Prose. It's all mixed together and you have tribute works to Obama shelved next to books on Plymouth and Jamestown. I splurged on "The Anglo Saxon World", soft cover, slick paper, lots of illustrations.
Their science fiction shelf was weak, many really OLD authors, books I either have, or have no desire to read. The "graphics novel" shelf was no better. The science shelf was mostly biology and arguments for and against Darwin.
It's big, and has an enormous stock. Their shelving policy can slow you down. Usually you shelve history books by date (of subject) so that revolutionary war books get shelved next to each other, likewise civil war books and so on. Not at Politics and Prose. It's all mixed together and you have tribute works to Obama shelved next to books on Plymouth and Jamestown. I splurged on "The Anglo Saxon World", soft cover, slick paper, lots of illustrations.
Their science fiction shelf was weak, many really OLD authors, books I either have, or have no desire to read. The "graphics novel" shelf was no better. The science shelf was mostly biology and arguments for and against Darwin.
Wednesday, April 26, 2017
Random road impressions
Drove down to Washington DC
to visit new born grandson. Weather was
poor. Ran into rain around White River
Junction and drove thru on and off rain showers the rest of the way. Spring is working on it. Trees around my place are still bare. By the time I got south to Brattleboro
they were all leafing. In DC they are in
full leaf.
NJ turnpike seems
to have misplace their toll booths. Got
off GW bridge, and onto the Jersey pike. No toll booth, could not get a ticket. Drove to the end of pike at Delaware Mem
bridge and paid full toll. Which is OK
since I had driven the pike from end to end, but beware if you are getting off early, say Philadelphia.
Coming thru Connecticut
I took the old road, Merritt Parkway. Conn
had done some work on it, fresh black asphalt, brightly painted lines, no potholes. New York,
not so much. Inside New
York, the Cross Bronx expressway was it's usual
shabby self. I notice that most of the
calls for "infrastructure" spending come from New Yorkers like Trump. Hoping the
feds will bail their roads out of decades of neglect. The other states keep their roads in fine
shape, what's wrong with New York?
Got on the infamous DC beltway by 3 PM. Traffic was heavy heavy. By 5 PM it was a lot lighter. I guess the civil servants all quit work by 3 PM. My tax money at work.
Monday, April 24, 2017
The NORKs are getting us hot and bothered.
Trump has invited all 100 senators to the White House for a classified briefing on the NORK situation. That's some kind of a first. I never heard of that happening before.
The NORKs have threatened to sink the USS Carl Vincent. And to nuke the US mainland. As for the carrier, they could get lucky with a diesel-electric sub, of which they have some. They would have to be pretty lucky to avoid detection and destruction by the carrier's escort destroyers, and they would have to get several torpedo hits, but it might happen. If they actually sank the carrier, as opposed to just launching on it, they could expect retaliation, probably air strikes. If the NORKs have a working nuclear warhead for a missile, that they have never tested, they might be able to nuke the western US. That ought to buy them wall to wall airstrikes, with nukes.
Going up against the NORKs with ground forces amounts to starting up the Korean War all over again. The NORKs have strengthened their army since the 1950s. The South Koreans have a large army, probably more motivated, better trained, and better equipped, but probably not enough to bring a quick and easy victory.
Our best bet is to convince the Chinese to cut off the NORKs imports of food and fuel. The Chinese may or may not go along with this. They want to keep the NORKs around for all the grief they can give the Americans and the South Koreans. And to keep a unified Korean, which would be run by the South Koreans, off their border.
If the Chinese option doesn't work (pretty likely) then the only other option I can see amounts to assassinating Kim Jong whats-his-face. That would bring the regime down in a welter of back biting and attempts to seize power. This might be our best option if we want to put the NORKs out of the nuclear business. The current NORK regime is dead set on getting nukes and the missiles to launch them. We will need to do regime change on North Korea to change that.
The NORKs have threatened to sink the USS Carl Vincent. And to nuke the US mainland. As for the carrier, they could get lucky with a diesel-electric sub, of which they have some. They would have to be pretty lucky to avoid detection and destruction by the carrier's escort destroyers, and they would have to get several torpedo hits, but it might happen. If they actually sank the carrier, as opposed to just launching on it, they could expect retaliation, probably air strikes. If the NORKs have a working nuclear warhead for a missile, that they have never tested, they might be able to nuke the western US. That ought to buy them wall to wall airstrikes, with nukes.
Going up against the NORKs with ground forces amounts to starting up the Korean War all over again. The NORKs have strengthened their army since the 1950s. The South Koreans have a large army, probably more motivated, better trained, and better equipped, but probably not enough to bring a quick and easy victory.
Our best bet is to convince the Chinese to cut off the NORKs imports of food and fuel. The Chinese may or may not go along with this. They want to keep the NORKs around for all the grief they can give the Americans and the South Koreans. And to keep a unified Korean, which would be run by the South Koreans, off their border.
If the Chinese option doesn't work (pretty likely) then the only other option I can see amounts to assassinating Kim Jong whats-his-face. That would bring the regime down in a welter of back biting and attempts to seize power. This might be our best option if we want to put the NORKs out of the nuclear business. The current NORK regime is dead set on getting nukes and the missiles to launch them. We will need to do regime change on North Korea to change that.
Sunday, April 23, 2017
That march for science.
I wonder how many of the marchers had a minimum of scientific education. I strongly feel that all high school students should take chemistry, physics, and biology. In the 21th century when so many policies and issues have science (or claim to have science) at their base, all citizens ought to have some science at the high school level in order to understand the arguments pro and con. Simple concepts, conservation of energy, the difference between compounds and elements, conservation of mass-energy, the difference between acid and alkali, specific heat and the heat of fusion, invariance of the speed of light, and more, are essential to real understanding. This isn't happening right now. Kids can coast thru high school with no science what so ever. A lot of 'em come out of high school unable to read an ordinary ruler.
Saturday, April 22, 2017
Tax Cuts bring prosperity? Heard on Fox News this morning.
They cited the prosperity that followed the Kennedy tax cuts (early 1960's) and the Reagan tax cuts (1980's) However back in those days the Feds mostly paid their bills with tax receipts, rather than by selling T-bills. Now a days taxes are not paying for the Feds, they are selling nearly $1 trillion worth of T-bills to keep those US treasury checks from bouncing. That's a scary amount of money. GNP is about $17 trillion, so the $1 trillion yearly deficit is about 6% of GNP. That's a bunch more than the deficit back in the Kennedy or Reagan years. It's one of the reasons GNP growth was 1% under Obama.
If we just cut taxes, we will have to run a bigger deficit. Sooner or later, people will stop buying T-bills and then things get dicey. Do we stop paying social security and medicare? Do we stop paying the troops? Do we just let the checks bounce? I don't want to go there.
Plus, selling T-bills is very close to just printing fresh dollar bills to meet our expenses. Look at it from the T-bill buyer's point of view. He gives Uncle cash, Uncle gives him a nicely printed bond, green ink and everything, just like a dollar bill. There is a market for T-bills, runs 5 days a week, 8 hours a day, and should our bondholder need cash, he picks up his phone, orders his broker to sell, and he will have cash in his account in a day or so. Does our bondholder feel any poorer after buying that T-bill? No, he figures the money is still his, he just put it into a T-bill which does pay a small amount of interest. As opposed to bank accounts which pay no interest at all these days.
And we all know that just printing more money causes inflation, the price of goods goes up, and we all agree that is not good.
So before tax cuts can bring prosperity, we will have to cut some spending. There are a lot of things that could be cut right down to zero.
Start with farm subsidies. There aren't that many farmers any more. I worked in industry for fifty years and we never got a penny of federal subsidies. Why should farmers get free money?
Then we could eliminate block grants to the states. If the states want to spend money they ought to have to raise it themselves. When you have to raise the money you will be more frugal in spending it. When you get free money from Uncle, it will be spent, every penny of it, whether the project is worthwhile or not.
Then we could shut down the federal dept of education. Education is controlled and funded at the city, town, and state level. We ought to leave it that way. The federal funds the ed dept hands out are really bribes to get the staties to do things Washington's way. We would be better off dropping the bribes and letting the locals do things their way.
And there are other things which will come to me as I think things other.
If we just cut taxes, we will have to run a bigger deficit. Sooner or later, people will stop buying T-bills and then things get dicey. Do we stop paying social security and medicare? Do we stop paying the troops? Do we just let the checks bounce? I don't want to go there.
Plus, selling T-bills is very close to just printing fresh dollar bills to meet our expenses. Look at it from the T-bill buyer's point of view. He gives Uncle cash, Uncle gives him a nicely printed bond, green ink and everything, just like a dollar bill. There is a market for T-bills, runs 5 days a week, 8 hours a day, and should our bondholder need cash, he picks up his phone, orders his broker to sell, and he will have cash in his account in a day or so. Does our bondholder feel any poorer after buying that T-bill? No, he figures the money is still his, he just put it into a T-bill which does pay a small amount of interest. As opposed to bank accounts which pay no interest at all these days.
And we all know that just printing more money causes inflation, the price of goods goes up, and we all agree that is not good.
So before tax cuts can bring prosperity, we will have to cut some spending. There are a lot of things that could be cut right down to zero.
Start with farm subsidies. There aren't that many farmers any more. I worked in industry for fifty years and we never got a penny of federal subsidies. Why should farmers get free money?
Then we could eliminate block grants to the states. If the states want to spend money they ought to have to raise it themselves. When you have to raise the money you will be more frugal in spending it. When you get free money from Uncle, it will be spent, every penny of it, whether the project is worthwhile or not.
Then we could shut down the federal dept of education. Education is controlled and funded at the city, town, and state level. We ought to leave it that way. The federal funds the ed dept hands out are really bribes to get the staties to do things Washington's way. We would be better off dropping the bribes and letting the locals do things their way.
And there are other things which will come to me as I think things other.
Friday, April 21, 2017
Dodd-Frank. Welfare for big banks
The Dodd-Frank bill, passed in the depths of Great Depression 2.0, essentially promises US taxpayer support for big US bank, should they screw up and go broke. It makes a list of "systemically important" banks, adds unwilling banks to the list now and then. These favored banks are required to file a ton of paperwork, including a financial last will and testament, supposedly to guide the Feds in a bailout, should they go over the cliff.
Bad idea all around. The bank managers are encouraged to make stupid loans, because they know the feds will bail them out should the stupid loans go bad. The rest of the world is reassured that US banks will live up to their commitments,no matter how stupid, using money from us long suffering taxpayers.
Better idea. Use the ancient Sherman Anti Trust act to break up any bank so big as to pose a threat to the financial system should it go broke. The justice department still has an entire office full of anti-trust lawyers, who haven't done squat in the last 20 years, other than draw their pay. They ought to be out earning their pay by breaking up banks "too big to fail".
Bad idea all around. The bank managers are encouraged to make stupid loans, because they know the feds will bail them out should the stupid loans go bad. The rest of the world is reassured that US banks will live up to their commitments,no matter how stupid, using money from us long suffering taxpayers.
Better idea. Use the ancient Sherman Anti Trust act to break up any bank so big as to pose a threat to the financial system should it go broke. The justice department still has an entire office full of anti-trust lawyers, who haven't done squat in the last 20 years, other than draw their pay. They ought to be out earning their pay by breaking up banks "too big to fail".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)