Driving down to DC, surveying the traffic

After posting about Ford getting out of the car business, at least the small econobox car business. I took note of what was on the road on the way down from Franconia to DC.  It does seem like fewer econoboxes, more pickups, more SUV's and the smaller SUVs that the car people call "crossovers".   About half the pickup trucks had company names painted on their doors, but the other half looked to be be privately owned. 
   And lots and lots of heavy trucks, 18 wheelers.  I figure that's a sign of a good economy, all those 18 wheelers on the road are either hauling some company's product to the customer, or going empty to pick up a load.  Lots and lots of heavy trucks on the interstates is a good sign.

Notes to Architects of Hotel/Motel[s]

I've on a trip to DC and have stayed in two pretty new hotels or motels on the way.  Used to be hotel was a multi story city building where you carried your bags in the front door and up to your room, and a motel was a one or two story building, each room with an exterior door, and you parked in front of you room door and carried your bags in  These two places were sorta hybrids.  You entered thru the front door, they were only a few stories tall  On points I should call them hotels.  But somehow that seems pretentious for what these places were, so I think of them as motels.  

   Improvement number 1 would be to find a floor covering that is not slippery as ice when wet.   Bathroom floors were glossy ceramic tile.  Stepping out of the shower was just asking for a fall.  Surely there is a tile product with a little grit in it to give some traction to a wet foot.  One place had a nice looking asphalt tile with a wood grain pattern to it in the bedroom.  Looked OK, but was slippery as all hell when wet.   Place had big sliding glass windows, that leaked when it rained, giving puddles on the bedroom floor.  Nearly broke my neck getting up to go to the bathroom at night. 

  Improvement Number 2, go with US standard light switches.  Both places had groovy Euro style switches, that were hard to see, even by day, and didn't feel like light switches in the dark, when you need to turn the lights on. 

   And while we are at it, lets go with water faucets clearly marked for hot and cold water.  At least colored red for hot and blue for cold.  A single tiny color dot isn't enough.

   One place had high definition TV cabled into all the rooms.  The working channels did show nice video.  About half the channels showed just error messages suggesting I check the antenna connections.  Some channels flicked off and then on.  Changing channels was slow, it took the high def TV 10-15 seconds to lock onto the high def digital signal and show a picture.  The TV would not remember it's channel settings, so turning it on in the morning meant you had to go looking for a watchable channel all over again. 

   And signage.  The Holiday Inn folk had the right idea back in the '60s, big sign, bright lights, make sure every one can see the place.  The place in DC had a tiny little sign, hidden by the brighter lights of a gas station, that I missed in the dark.   

Glad to see three American's freed from North Korea

At least they got out of Kim's jails with their health, unlike poor Otto Warmbier.  All three of them are obviously of Korean ancestry, but the press has uniformly called them Americans, which is a good thing.  And the fact that Kim let them go indicates that Kim wants something from the Americans and he thought letting these guys go would put the Americans into a better frame of mind. 

Note to foreign governments

To make a deal with the United States you have to push thru a treaty, ratified by the Senate.  Otherwise you don't have a deal.  As the Iranians are finding out.  Obama knew he could never get the Senate to agree to the Iranian deal, so he never sent to to the Senate for ratification, which means it is not a deal binding upon the United States.  And probably Obama knew that the Iranians would never agree to the kind of terms that the Senate would ratify.  So Obama settled for a not-treaty scrap of paper that was only good as long as Obama remained President.  The ever sucking up newsies gave Obama the same good publicity as if he had gotten a real treaty, which was all Obama really cared about. 
   Anyhow, if you don't get a treaty ratified by the Senate, you don't have a binding deal.
   The real trick will be to get the Europeans and Boeing to forgo all those sales to Iran.  The Iranians have good money from crude oil sales to buy a lotta stuff.  They want to buy a flock of jetliners from Boeing (many $billion in sales) and about the same number from Airbus.  Plus a lot of other stuff.  It's gonna be hard to get everyone to forgo all that Iranian money.  

Turning point in history 1782

The American Revolution is just won.  The British have capitulated and will sign a peace treaty giving the Americans just about everything they fought for. 
   Thirteen Colonies, now thirteen independent sovereign states.  Each one possesses a state government, state courts, a state code of law, an army, a navy, a state establishment that runs things to their liking and wants to keep it that way.  They all have conflicting claims to western lands, their original charters tended to claim all the land clear out to the Pacific Ocean.   Each new state, born in battle, has plenty of reasons to want to retain every scrap of their hard won liberty.  Each new state was plenty big enough by the standards of the 18th century to be an self sufficient independent nation. 
   How did these thirteen independent states manage to bury their various hatchets and form the Union?  It helped that they all spoke the same language, and had fought side by side against the British.  It also helped that they all correctly viewed Britain as a super power, who was just itching to get even for loosing the Revolutionary War, and the slightest sign of American disunity would bring the Redcoats back in force.
   As it was, each American state had to give up important pieces of sovereignty, like the right to have armies and navies, to negotiate with foreign powers, to levy tariffs against each other,  and accept laws passed by the new Federal government.  Somehow, they managed to come up with a long lasting deal, the US Constitution, that they all bought into, and which has lasted to this day.  They could have so easily got into a large variety of petty squabbles or not so petty squabbles like slavery, and all gone home mad and determined to go it alone.  Which would have seriously changed history.  

Gina Haspell for CIA director

She is Mike Pompeo's choice to replace himself.  She is a new name to me.  Apparently she is an old CIA hand, been with the agency for 30 plus years.  Actually worked in the field, collecting intelligence, rather than being a paper shuffling desk weenie back at Langley.
   Democrats have been trashing her because some of the intelligence she gathered came from vigorous interrogation of,(possibly waterboarding of) Al Quada prisoners back right after 9/11.   I'm perfectly OK with this, it shows she was actually gathering intelligence rather than opining without facts.  Or leaking to the NY Times.
  If I was going to criticize Ms Haspell, I would ask her about her views on past CIA disasters, such as the failure to predict the fall of the Soviet Union, their prediction that Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons, their prediction that the Iranians had stopped  their nuclear weapons program, the Valerie Plame case, and leaking the story of Bin Laden's satellite phone to the New York Times.  Bin Laden must read the Times too, after the satellite phone story broke, Bin Laden got rid of his  phone and ran Al Quada by messengers.  This probably extended his life by five years. 

Facebook's New "feature"

In the last few days, Facebook began placing tags on news articles that they force onto your Facebook feed.  Click on the tag and you get a short writeup containing the name of the source  of the article (useful) and Facebook's opinion of that source.  For Breitbart News, their opinion went on for two lines calling Breitbart right wing extremists and screwballs.  Neutral it was not.
  Question for Facebook.  If you think Breitbart is alt right trash, why do you push Breitbart articles onto my Facebook feed?