That was the title of a Saturday WSJ editorial. I assume they were discussing a bill that has made the news in the last couple of days. So I read the editorial, hoping to understand just what the bill was and what it would do. Especially what it would do to me.
No luck. The Journal's standards are slipping. The editorial was unreadable. And it made at least one big whopper. The Journal said " The crew pushing the rule say cable companies deserve scrutiny because it is easy to change websites but hard to change internet service providers. The reality is the reverse:" Many of us live out of town and we don't get a choice of ISPs. Up here Time Warner is the ONLY ISP offering broadband. It is not hard the change ISP, it's impossible, there is only Time Warner.
The rest of the editorial jumped around, issued blame, with out ever getting down to the real issue, how much privacy are we giving up and to who.
There isn't much privacy left. I figure my browsing history, all my email, all my purchases on the net, all my facebook posts, every app installed on my laptop, and probably some other stuff, is on the net, and anyone (cops, political opponents, nosy snoopers, the Russians, anyone) can see it. I only post harmless stuff, photos of local scenery, cat pictures, cute kid pictures. I don't visit porn sites and I don't visit music share sites. I don't do Internet banking, I pay the bills with paper checks. Since I am retired, out of the job market, and the children are grown up, I don't worry much. Those of you still in the job market and still raising children need to do the worrying.