Socialism is a polite word for Communism. Karl Marx decried the capitalism of his time as exploitation of the workers. Marx's solution was to have the government, Communist government, take ownership of all the "means of production", basically the entire economy, and to divvy up the proceeds of enterprises among all the workers. Trouble was, after government take over, the enterprises stopped making money, and there was little or nothing to divvy up. The revolutionary government of Russia in 1917 called themselves Communists and blackened the name of Communism so badly that future Communists decided to call themselves and their regimes Socialist rather than Communist.
Today's Democrats and/or Democratic Socialists are more interested in more free stuff than they are about government ownership of the means of production. Or at least that's the way they talk. We should remember that Communist or Socialist regimes inflict serious national poverty upon the nations stupid enough to embrace Communism or Socialism. Examples are Venezuela, Cuba, and Russia. So there will be little free stuff to hand out.
Capitalism produces vast amounts of wealth and lifts countless people out of poverty. Under capitalism all the means of production are owned and controlled by private individuals who operate them effectively. The owners take a slice of the proceeds, in many cases a whacking big slice, but they produce rivers of stuff, enough to fill our store shelves, and flood us with motor vehicles, aircraft, computers, gasoline, air conditioners, electronics, furnace oil, interstate highways, internet, and God only knows what else. Better to have plenty of everything even if the owners get away with a great big slice.
You gotta wonder about those polls claiming that yuge numbers of people want "socialism". What have our schools been teaching?
This blog posts about aviation, automobiles, electronics, programming, politics and such other subjects as catch my interest. The blog is based in northern New Hampshire, USA
Sunday, May 19, 2019
Silly talk about NH paid family leave bill. WMUR
We had Chuck Morse (Republican Senate minority leader) and Dan Feltes (Democratic Senate majority leader) on WMUR this morning. They talked about the comprehensive family leave bill, which the Democrats passed and Governor Sununu vetoed. Feltes was saying that we need the family leave bill to attract young workers to New Hampshire.
That's malarkey. People decide to move into New Hampshire if they find, or think they can find, a good job, a better job than the one they have. Then they consider housing costs (rents or house prices), taxes, commuting time, and skiing, snowmobiling, ATV riding, hiking, climbing, fishing, and all the other outdoor activities that New Hampshire is famous for. Few will get down to considering the presence or absence of paid family leave when deciding to come to New Hampshire. Dan Feltes is flim flamming us on that one.
The bill the democrats passed, and the governor vetoed, (SB1) offered generous benefits, and a stiff income tax to pay for them. The current economic boom, good times, came about from both federal and state tax cuts. Adding a 1% (or more, a bureaucrat can raise it if he thinks the program needs more money) undoes the good work that tax cuts have given us.
That's malarkey. People decide to move into New Hampshire if they find, or think they can find, a good job, a better job than the one they have. Then they consider housing costs (rents or house prices), taxes, commuting time, and skiing, snowmobiling, ATV riding, hiking, climbing, fishing, and all the other outdoor activities that New Hampshire is famous for. Few will get down to considering the presence or absence of paid family leave when deciding to come to New Hampshire. Dan Feltes is flim flamming us on that one.
The bill the democrats passed, and the governor vetoed, (SB1) offered generous benefits, and a stiff income tax to pay for them. The current economic boom, good times, came about from both federal and state tax cuts. Adding a 1% (or more, a bureaucrat can raise it if he thinks the program needs more money) undoes the good work that tax cuts have given us.
Thursday, May 16, 2019
NH Senate session 15 May
Senate session, Wednesday 15 May. This was a long one. Started at 10
AM and lasted until 5 PM. We dealt with a lotta bills, most of them nit
noi unimportant stuff. We kicked things off
by passing the Fast Track calendar with 17 bills on it with one quick voice
vote, no debate. Then we faced up to 51
bills on the regular calendar.
We killed HB 558
the plastic straw ban bill. We amended
HB 560, the plastic bag ban into something totally different. After amendment HB560 didn’t say any thing
about plastic or bags, but now requires cities and towns to report weight of
trash dealt with to DES. Guess my town
will have to buy a scale. We stalled off HB 447 about school calendars by
re-referring it to committee. It would
have allowed school boards to start school anytime they please which guts an
earlier bill we passed that required schools to start after Labor Day. I
think starting school before Labor Day is child abuse, but teachers and
administrators would start school in July if they thought they could get away
with it.
We passed HB 446 on
a voice vote. This bill allows editing
your birth certificate to remove “Male” or “Female” and replace it with “Other”. We passed HB 669 that would do the same for
NH driver’s licenses on a voice vote.
That’s all the
interesting bills. The bulk of them are
just not interesting enough to me to comment on them. Twelve bills created study committees, which
I think is a polite way of killing the issue.
And, we passed HB
280 making the red tailed hawk the state raptor. Important issue that. Apparently a bunch of 4th graders
proposed this bill four years ago. Those
kids are now in 8th grade, and they were present for the vote on HB
280. I think we taught them that it
takes forever to get the NH legislature to anything.
NH Senate Activity. 13 May
Ed Comm hearings, Tuesday, 13 May. This was executive session day, no
hearings. We only had two bills to deal
with. HB 131 was an attempt to recover
the Signum University
degree granting authority. We passed a
bill in the Senate to grant degree granting authority to Signum back a month
ago. For some unclear reason the House
killed it last week. We tried to revive
it by tacking the Signum bill onto HB 131 as a rider. Ed committee chairman Senator Jay Kahn
discouraged this scheme, saying the house would kill it. He suggested we offer the Signum amendment as
a floor amendment during senate session this week. Well, that never happened, and Signum, an
innovative way to gain a college degree is without NH support, even though the
NH Dept of Ed thinks they are doing good.
Too bad.
Then we rehashed HB
226 which would grant teachers their “experienced educator” certificate after
only three years of class room teaching, instead of the current five
years. We added a lot of verbiage to the
bill, making it harder to figure out what it was doing. Which is OK by me. Three years of class room teaching is
plenty. In the Air Force we put teachers
in front of classrooms after only three weeks of training. And the Air Force teachers, just sergeants,
pulled right off the flight line, with classes of rowdy teen aged airmen, did
just fine. I took some courses and the
instructors were as good as, of better than, any teachers I ever had.
Anyhow, Tuesday cleaned up the last Ed Comm bills. No Ed Comm hearings next Tuesday.
Sunday, May 12, 2019
What to do about Facebook?
They have been selling user's data. They don't keep anything confidential. They have been kicking conservative posters off. They are almost the only game in town. So what to do?
1. Do nothing. If Facebook kicks you off, start a blog.
2. Use anti trust laws to break Facebook into two (or more) viable pieces. This ought to create competition. Conservatives black balled off of one piece can re apply to the other piece. The two pieces ought to compete for advertising by lowering their rates.
3. Regulate. Set up a commission of "impartial" members to lay down the law to Zuckerburg. Will stir things up for a while. Then Facebook will capture the regulators by taking them out to lunch, and other juicy things, and offering them cushy jobs with Facebook if they treat Facebook right. Plus, real control of what Facebook actually does will remain in Zuckerborg's hands. The regulators won't be able to tell if Facebook is doing what they are told to do or not.
4. Encourage a competitor to compete. Probably not viable. Facebook has occupied the market space and getting started against them probably is not possible.
5. Something else?
I started up a Facebook page to support my Senate campaign. It got a lot of hits. Like 150 for each time I posted. I believe it did me a lot of good in the election. I won after all. I am still on Facebook. They have not booted me, or even bitched to me. Yet.
Islamic terrorists have posted a lot of really disgusting and hateful stuff on Facebook. I'm glad to hear Facebook is doing something about that. At least that's what I hear, mostly from Facebook. I can believe as much of that as I please. They claim that Russian trolls have used Facebook posts to influence the 2016 election. Not sure if I believe that. Putin, old KGB man, has good intel on America, and must have known that Hillary was his best bet. Hillary isn't very smart, isn't very brave, and would never give Putin any trouble over Russian aggression anywhere. Trump was (still is) a wild card. Nobody knows what he will do next. Putin knew all this well before the US election. It is inconceivable to me that Putin wanted Trump to win.
1. Do nothing. If Facebook kicks you off, start a blog.
2. Use anti trust laws to break Facebook into two (or more) viable pieces. This ought to create competition. Conservatives black balled off of one piece can re apply to the other piece. The two pieces ought to compete for advertising by lowering their rates.
3. Regulate. Set up a commission of "impartial" members to lay down the law to Zuckerburg. Will stir things up for a while. Then Facebook will capture the regulators by taking them out to lunch, and other juicy things, and offering them cushy jobs with Facebook if they treat Facebook right. Plus, real control of what Facebook actually does will remain in Zuckerborg's hands. The regulators won't be able to tell if Facebook is doing what they are told to do or not.
4. Encourage a competitor to compete. Probably not viable. Facebook has occupied the market space and getting started against them probably is not possible.
5. Something else?
I started up a Facebook page to support my Senate campaign. It got a lot of hits. Like 150 for each time I posted. I believe it did me a lot of good in the election. I won after all. I am still on Facebook. They have not booted me, or even bitched to me. Yet.
Islamic terrorists have posted a lot of really disgusting and hateful stuff on Facebook. I'm glad to hear Facebook is doing something about that. At least that's what I hear, mostly from Facebook. I can believe as much of that as I please. They claim that Russian trolls have used Facebook posts to influence the 2016 election. Not sure if I believe that. Putin, old KGB man, has good intel on America, and must have known that Hillary was his best bet. Hillary isn't very smart, isn't very brave, and would never give Putin any trouble over Russian aggression anywhere. Trump was (still is) a wild card. Nobody knows what he will do next. Putin knew all this well before the US election. It is inconceivable to me that Putin wanted Trump to win.
Saturday, May 11, 2019
Avengers:Endgame 2019
I took it in at the Jax Jr in Littleton this afternoon. The theater was chilly, even for me wearing a fleece vest over my shirt, and a ski parka. It's looong. Three hours. A lot of scenes when far longer than need be. I recognized some characters from previous Marvel flicks, Captain America (Steve Rogers) Tony Stark (Ironman but we don't see him wearing the Ironman suit), Rocket Racoon, Groot, Thor, Hulk. Bunch of new faces that meant nothing to me. Some of them vaguely familiar looking, must have turned up somewhere sometime in a Marvel movie. The bow and arrow guy from I forget which flick turned up.
There was a hint of plot. The Avengers must develop time travel to got back and acquire/steal/rescue five magic gemstones needed to save the world. Some awful catastrophe has overtaken poor old Earth and with the five magic stones the avengers can fix it. Needless to say the stones are recovered and then a lot of hand to hand combat with a large armored nasty happens.
Despite glowing rating in the print press and Rotten Tomatoes, I was not all that impressed.
There was a hint of plot. The Avengers must develop time travel to got back and acquire/steal/rescue five magic gemstones needed to save the world. Some awful catastrophe has overtaken poor old Earth and with the five magic stones the avengers can fix it. Needless to say the stones are recovered and then a lot of hand to hand combat with a large armored nasty happens.
Despite glowing rating in the print press and Rotten Tomatoes, I was not all that impressed.
New tariffs on Chinese goods will make life interesting for WalMart.
Nearly all the goods on Walmart's shelves are made in China. The 25% tariff going into effect is going to put a squeeze on Walmart. Unless there is more juice in the business (like 25% juice, which is unlikely) which I doubt, something has got to give. Most likely Walmart will have to raise their prices.
As for me, I don't shop Walmarts all that much. At my stage of life I am pretty well fixed for housewares and clothing and appliances. I do buy my prescriptions there, but I think those are all made in USA.
May you live in interesting times.
As for me, I don't shop Walmarts all that much. At my stage of life I am pretty well fixed for housewares and clothing and appliances. I do buy my prescriptions there, but I think those are all made in USA.
May you live in interesting times.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)