So if you really think that so-and-so was a no-good-nick, write a paper, write a letter to the editor, write a textbook, write a post on your blog, make a U-tube video, anything. But leave so-and-so’s statue up. People see the statue and they are more likely to read your pieces explaining why he was bad. They will at least know the name.
This blog posts about aviation, automobiles, electronics, programming, politics and such other subjects as catch my interest. The blog is based in northern New Hampshire, USA
Saturday, July 4, 2020
Lay off the statue bashing
The current craze for busting statues is bad. Even if the statue is of someone who did bad
stuff, it is better to leave the statue unmolested and teach about the person
so commemorated. History is past, we
cannot change it now. Knocking down the
statues of historical figures erases the history that those people figured
in. For example, the Civil War is an
important part of American history; you cannot understand America
today unless you know about the Civil War.
And you need to know about the leaders on both sides of the Civil
War. Robert E. Lee was an honorable man,
who fought a clean war. In 1860 Lee was
offered command of the Union army. When
Lee thought about leading Union troops against his beloved home state of Virginia,
he simply could not do it. Instead he
resigned his Union army commission and joined the Confederacy. To understand the Civil War, you have to know
who Lee was, and what he did. Likewise you have to know who Stonewall Jackson
was and what he did. You don’t have to
approve of them, but you do have to know who they were. If we knock down statues of both men because
they fought for the Confederacy, a lot of citizens, who don’t read history
books, will be deprived of key bits of history that they would profit from
knowing.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment